Use atomic pointer in go 1.19 #446
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
This PR is stale because it has been open 21 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 14 days. |
|
@JekaMas ci fixes and conflicts are left |
|
blocked by golangci/golangci-lint#3037 |
JekaMas
force-pushed
the
1.19-atomic-pointer
branch
from
5cb8cba
to
aeb5a64
Compare
cffls
approved these changes
Aug 8, 2022
manav2401
approved these changes
Aug 9, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
as a developer I'd like to have as simple as possible primitive for concurrency.
atomic.Pointer[T]seems much better then mutex dance.