Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add postgres smallint to unmodifiable types #1027

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

jong82
Copy link

@jong82 jong82 commented Mar 6, 2020

The smallint length was being added to the sql script generation, leading to incorrect syntax. Adding this to the list of unmodifiable types.

Built and tested locally.

Closes #1015

┆Issue is synchronized with this Jira Bug by Unito

@SteveDonie SteveDonie added RiskLow Trivial changes in spelling, documentation changes, focused bug fixes, etc. RiskMedium Changes that require more testing or that affect many different code paths. and removed RiskLow Trivial changes in spelling, documentation changes, focused bug fixes, etc. labels Mar 25, 2020
@SteveDonie
Copy link
Contributor

@nvoxland Please review. I have labeled it Risk:Medium just because I am not sure. If the risk is low, please change to that.

@ro-rah
Copy link

ro-rah commented Apr 10, 2020

Hi @jong82

Thanks for your pull request!

Here’s what happens next:

A member of the Liquibase team will take a look at your contribution and may suggest
changes, additional tests, or provide other feedback. The PR will be prioritized
according to our internal development and testing capacity.

We’ll let you know when it’s ready to move to the next step or if any changes are needed.

@ro-rah
Copy link

ro-rah commented Apr 10, 2020

@nvoxland, I kept this at Risk Medium, looks like we have room for that in the next sprint.

Looks like user identified when the issue may have started and then decided to add it unmodifiable types.

I can't say weather or not that or reverting the else if would be best, I defer to you.

@liquibot
Copy link
Contributor

➤ Erzsebet Carmean commented:

Thanks for the contribution, @ jong82! I'm flagging this for internal discussion to help QA size a test effort.

-erz (@ XDelphiGrl)

CC: [~accountid:557058:c8f0b24d-f02f-431c-8842-fd9c929dfbf2]
CC: [~accountid:5d937e71f5d3c10d8bfd351d]

@liquibot
Copy link
Contributor

liquibot commented Jun 4, 2020

➤ Erzsebet Carmean commented:

I'm going to need a little help understanding how to test this issue. Flagging for discussion.

-erz (@ XDelphiGrl)

CC: [~accountid:557058:c8f0b24d-f02f-431c-8842-fd9c929dfbf2]

@molivasdat molivasdat added this to To Do in Conditioning++ via automation Nov 1, 2021
@mariochampion mariochampion moved this from To Do to Ready for Handoff (In JIRA) in Conditioning++ Nov 8, 2021
@StevenMassaro
Copy link
Contributor

Closing since this was already resolved, see #1046

Conditioning++ automation moved this from Ready for Handoff (In JIRA) to Done Nov 18, 2021
@nvoxland nvoxland removed this from Done in Conditioning++ Nov 18, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
DBPostgres IntegrationAny RiskMedium Changes that require more testing or that affect many different code paths. SyncTicket ThemeDBObjects TypeBug
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Postgres smallint syntax error
9 participants