-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
clarify the description of the metric apiserver_storage_objects #120597
clarify the description of the metric apiserver_storage_objects #120597
Conversation
|
Welcome @machine424! |
Hi @machine424. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
cc @dgrisonnet |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/assign @logicalhan
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: e7de8b5cce1fc940a71f2d91756846f7b8202aa6
|
For reference, this is where we set the metric to |
/release-note-none |
/ok-to-test |
@machine424 could you please run |
2f56ff9
to
084deb7
Compare
Was waiting for some tests to fail :) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Have you run the unit tests? I suspect they're going to fail due to the change in the HELP text.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/approve
I guess we don't test this metric in our unit tests.
/retest |
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 2bcbdb1fd452a2f381445e0ffa2917e60c39a49a
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: dgrisonnet, logicalhan, machine424 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@machine424 would you perhaps be interested in covering the unit test gap for this metric in a follow-up PR? |
/triage accepted |
@dgrisonnet It's already covered by |
The stable metrics verification is just a static check. You can find the unit tests here: https://github.com/machine424/kubernetes/blob/084deb7a7cf147bbafd131ab1a36852a79f08a64/staging/src/k8s.io/apiserver/pkg/storage/etcd3/metrics/metrics_test.go But as Han mentioned before, there are none for this metric yet. |
Thanks, I’ll try to add them then. |
Opened a PR here #120827 |
What type of PR is this?
/kind documentation
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
kubernetes/website#43012
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
Doc at https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/instrumentation/metrics/ will be updated
Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.: