Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

doc: Patches can't wildcard match within one resource #4250

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ringerc
Copy link

@ringerc ringerc commented Oct 20, 2021

Update the patchMultipleObjects docs to explain that there is no support
for applying one patch to multiple objects within a single resource,
e.g. patching the env list or imagePullPolicy for all containers in a
single Deployment resource.

A single patch can be applied to multiple distinct k8s resources, e.g.
patch all Deployment, but not multiple json objects within one resource.

Point to the transformers documentation to help users discover the image
transformer, name prefix/suffix transformer, etc.

Update the patchMultipleObjects docs to explain that there is no support
for applying one patch to multiple objects within a single resource,
e.g. patching the env list or imagePullPolicy for all containers in a
single Deployment resource.

A single patch can be applied to multiple distinct k8s resources, e.g.
patch all Deployment, but not multiple json objects within one resource.

Point to the transformers documentation to help users discover the image
transformer, name prefix/suffix transformer, etc.
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for your pull request. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

📝 Please follow instructions at https://git.k8s.io/community/CLA.md#the-contributor-license-agreement to sign the CLA.

It may take a couple minutes for the CLA signature to be fully registered; after that, please reply here with a new comment and we'll verify. Thanks.


Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. label Oct 20, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @ringerc!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/kustomize 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/kustomize has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @ringerc. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Oct 20, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Oct 20, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@natasha41575 natasha41575 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I know this is very late... but I realized that over a month ago I'd started a review and forgot to hit submit 🤦

@@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ a _target selector_:
[strategic merge patch]: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/sig-api-machinery/strategic-merge-patch.md
[json patch]: jsonpatch.md

Note that a strategic merge patch must still have a `metadata.name` field even if the `patch`'s `target.name` overrides it. Its value will be ignored, but it must be present.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we add a sentence for what happens if it is not present?

specifiers ("OR"-like), just add multiple patch list
entries with different targets that reference the same
patch file.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would you mind providing a short example of a patches field that achieves this?

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Mark this issue or PR as rotten with /lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue or PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Apr 10, 2022
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue or PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels May 10, 2022
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Reopen this issue or PR with /reopen
  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@k8s-triage-robot: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Reopen this issue or PR with /reopen
  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@ringerc
Copy link
Author

ringerc commented Jun 20, 2022

@natasha41575 Sorry, I didn't see your review. The bot ate my branch and I don't have the rights to re-open the PR.

I've tried to contribute to the docs. If you or anyone else think this is a worthwhile change, please feel free to open a new PR based on it.

both strategic merge patches and json patches.

For example, there is presently no way to express the operation
"append a new entry to the `env` list for every container in a
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please note that we would like to have the replacements transformer support this, if someone has bandwidth to contribute it, tracked here: #4561

It currently works as long as the field in question is already present (i.e. to overwrite the value). See the wildcard format toward the end of this section: https://kubectl.docs.kubernetes.io/references/kustomize/kustomization/replacements/#field-path-format. Since this doc is about how to patch multiple objects, I think discussion of the replacements transformer approach would be a valuable addition to it.

@KnVerey KnVerey reopened this Jul 13, 2022
@linux-foundation-easycla
Copy link

CLA Not Signed

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ringerc
To complete the pull request process, please assign knverey after the PR has been reviewed.
You can assign the PR to them by writing /assign @knverey in a comment when ready.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@KnVerey
Copy link
Contributor

KnVerey commented Jul 13, 2022

I just noticed that you haven't signed the CLA and weren't actually asking us to reopen (misread your last message). The bot doesn't touch your branch, which still exists here if you are ready to sign the CLA and open a new PR: patch-1.

@KnVerey KnVerey closed this Jul 13, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants