Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

✨ Descriptiveness check overhaul #36

Merged

Conversation

Adirio
Copy link
Contributor

@Adirio Adirio commented Feb 2, 2021

Measure descriptiveness by characters (80) instead of lines (2) and skip descriptiveness check if the "skip-descriptiveness-check" flag is set.

Closes: #34

Signed-off-by: Adrian Orive <adrian.orive.oneca@gmail.com>
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Feb 2, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Feb 2, 2021
@Adirio
Copy link
Contributor Author

Adirio commented Feb 2, 2021

/cc @estroz

@Adirio Adirio mentioned this pull request Feb 2, 2021
6 tasks
Copy link

@estroz estroz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Two suggestions, lgtm overall.

verify/descriptiveness.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
verify/descriptiveness.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
…s set.

Signed-off-by: Adrian Orive <adrian.orive.oneca@gmail.com>
@Adirio Adirio force-pushed the descriptiveness-check-overhaul branch from 42ee935 to 3d74348 Compare February 2, 2021 18:26
@Adirio
Copy link
Contributor Author

Adirio commented Feb 2, 2021

@estroz Thank you for the suggestions Eric, pushed those two changes.

Copy link

@estroz estroz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Adirio, estroz

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 2, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 01981b8 into kubernetes-sigs:master Feb 2, 2021
@Adirio Adirio deleted the descriptiveness-check-overhaul branch February 2, 2021 18:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

improve PR description verifier
3 participants