Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

✨ allow setting watchTimeoutPeriod when creating informers #2738

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ccding
Copy link

@ccding ccding commented Mar 27, 2024

We use kubebuilder to create operators. These operators watch a lot of resources. The default watch timeout is a random number between 5 and 10 minutes, which triggers a re-watch every 7.5 minutes on average. However, this behavior causes a log of QPS to our k8s API server. We want to increase the watch timeout to reduce the overhead of the API server, thus this PR makes it configurable.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ccding
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign alvaroaleman for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Mar 27, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @ccding!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/controller-runtime 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/controller-runtime has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Mar 27, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @ccding. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Mar 27, 2024
@xiang90
Copy link

xiang90 commented Mar 27, 2024

/cc @FillZpp Can you take a look? Thanks!

// times out, the cache will close the watch and reconnect.
//
// Defaults to a random duration between 5 and 10 minutes if unset.
WatchTimeoutPeriod *time.Duration
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LG. Will it be easier to understand if name it like RewatchPeriod?

A WatchTimeoutPeriod field in cache.Options seems to be the timeout that waits for the cache starting to watch?

WDYT @xiang90 @sbueringer @vincepri

@@ -354,6 +360,9 @@ func (ip *Informers) addInformerToMap(gvk schema.GroupVersionKind, obj runtime.O
WatchFunc: func(opts metav1.ListOptions) (watch.Interface, error) {
ip.selector.ApplyToList(&opts)
opts.Watch = true // Watch needs to be set to true separately
if ip.watchTimeoutPeriod != nil {
opts.TimeoutSeconds = ptr.To(int64(ip.watchTimeoutPeriod.Seconds()))
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since this is a certain time without any random, it might bring a large number of watch requests to apiserver when all the old watches closed and try to reconnect, if your operator watch a lot of resources as you described in this pr.

This is why the default timeout is a random number between 5 and 10 minutes. So how about add a little random time base on the given period?

Copy link
Author

@ccding ccding Mar 29, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@FillZpp
Copy link
Contributor

FillZpp commented Mar 29, 2024

/lgtm

/assign @alvaroaleman @vincepri @sbueringer
PTAL :)

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 29, 2024
@FillZpp
Copy link
Contributor

FillZpp commented Mar 29, 2024

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Mar 29, 2024
@FillZpp FillZpp added the tide/merge-method-squash Denotes a PR that should be squashed by tide when it merges. label Mar 29, 2024
@alvaroaleman
Copy link
Member

However, this behavior causes a log of QPS to our k8s API server

The majority of the server-side cost to a watch is in sending the data, not in a client establishing a connection. Clients resume watches from where they left off using the ResourceVersion, so the only thing this could possibly save is some TLS handshakes, which seems neglible to me. Have you done any benchmarking to see the impact of this?

This is an extremely low-level setting and people might not understand the implications of changing it. If we are going to expose something like this, I want to see some data that this actually makes a meaningful difference.

@alvaroaleman
Copy link
Member

/hold

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Mar 30, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. tide/merge-method-squash Denotes a PR that should be squashed by tide when it merges.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants