Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

馃尡 ClusterCacheTracker: use indexes field instead of passing it around #10606

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 17, 2024

Conversation

sbueringer
Copy link
Member

Signed-off-by: Stefan B眉ringer buringerst@vmware.com

What this PR does / why we need it:
Not really important but I was reading through the code and it's just easier to reason about if we make it clear that we just use the indexes field and it's not passed in via any exported method.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #

Signed-off-by: Stefan B眉ringer buringerst@vmware.com
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/needs-area PR is missing an area label size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels May 14, 2024
Copy link
Member

@chrischdi chrischdi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 14, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: f5d22b8f27fab4823ed681f139f7b5dd522e7175

@sbueringer sbueringer added the area/clustercachetracker Issues or PRs related to the clustercachetracker label May 14, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/needs-area PR is missing an area label label May 14, 2024
Copy link
Member

@chrischdi chrischdi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

/hold if you want to give others a look too

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label May 16, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: chrischdi

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 16, 2024
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/hold cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label May 17, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit e8d4784 into kubernetes-sigs:main May 17, 2024
24 checks passed
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.8 milestone May 17, 2024
@sbueringer sbueringer deleted the pr-cct-improv branch May 17, 2024 11:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/clustercachetracker Issues or PRs related to the clustercachetracker cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants