Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: all big enough ui proxy requests fail with error proxying with partial data #4266

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Jul 24, 2020

Conversation

Bobgy
Copy link
Contributor

@Bobgy Bobgy commented Jul 23, 2020

Description of your changes:
When trying out multi user mode for Kubeflow 1.1. After the cluster is up and running for a while, suddenly all big enough ui proxy requests fail with error proxying with partial data. I suspected some behavior changed for Anthos Service Mesh (istio), because I tried removing all istio sidecars, the error doesn't show up.

However, I tried troubleshooting for a while and found this hack solution from chimurai/http-proxy-middleware#171 (comment), it worked perfectly to my surprise.
Checking this in first to unblock Kubeflow 1.1 GCP release.

Checklist:

  • The title for your pull request (PR) should follow our title convention. Learn more about the pull request title convention used in this repository.

    PR titles examples:

    • fix(frontend): fixes empty page. Fixes #1234
      Use fix to indicate that this PR fixes a bug.
    • feat(backend): configurable service account. Fixes #1234, fixes #1235
      Use feat to indicate that this PR adds a new feature.
    • chore: set up changelog generation tools
      Use chore to indicate that this PR makes some changes that users don't need to know.
    • test: fix CI failure. Part of #1234
      Use part of to indicate that a PR is working on an issue, but shouldn't close the issue when merged.
  • Do you want this pull request (PR) cherry-picked into the current release branch?

    If yes, use one of the following options:

    • (Recommended.) Ask the PR approver to add the cherrypick-approved label to this PR. The release manager adds this PR to the release branch in a batch update.
    • After this PR is merged, create a cherry-pick PR to add these changes to the release branch. (For more information about creating a cherry-pick PR, see the Kubeflow Pipelines release guide.)

@kubeflow-bot
Copy link

This change is Reviewable

@Bobgy
Copy link
Contributor Author

Bobgy commented Jul 23, 2020

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Bobgy

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@Bobgy Bobgy added the lgtm label Jul 23, 2020
@Bobgy Bobgy added this to In progress in KFP and Kubeflow 1.1 integration Jul 23, 2020
@Bobgy Bobgy self-assigned this Jul 23, 2020
@Bobgy Bobgy added the cherrypick-approved area OWNER approves to cherry pick this PR to current active release branch label Jul 23, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm label Jul 24, 2020
@Bobgy Bobgy added the lgtm label Jul 24, 2020
@Bobgy
Copy link
Contributor Author

Bobgy commented Jul 24, 2020

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@Bobgy: you cannot LGTM your own PR.

In response to this:

/lgtm

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit c7300c3 into kubeflow:master Jul 24, 2020
KFP and Kubeflow 1.1 integration automation moved this from In progress to Done Jul 24, 2020
@Bobgy Bobgy deleted the fix_large_response_fail_halfway branch July 24, 2020 04:18
jingzhang36 pushed a commit to jingzhang36/pipelines that referenced this pull request Aug 12, 2020
…artial data (kubeflow#4266)

* fix: all big enough ui proxy requests fail with error proxying with partial data

* Fix naming
jingzhang36 pushed a commit to jingzhang36/pipelines that referenced this pull request Aug 12, 2020
…artial data (kubeflow#4266)

* fix: all big enough ui proxy requests fail with error proxying with partial data

* Fix naming
Bobgy added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 12, 2020
…artial data (#4266)

* fix: all big enough ui proxy requests fail with error proxying with partial data

* Fix naming
@jingzhang36 jingzhang36 added the cherrypicked cherry picked to release branch `release-x.y` label Aug 12, 2020
Jeffwan pushed a commit to Jeffwan/pipelines that referenced this pull request Dec 9, 2020
…artial data (kubeflow#4266)

* fix: all big enough ui proxy requests fail with error proxying with partial data

* Fix naming
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved cherrypick-approved area OWNER approves to cherry pick this PR to current active release branch cherrypicked cherry picked to release branch `release-x.y` cla: yes lgtm size/S
Projects
No open projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants