Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add more docs about JWK support #341

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 1, 2020
Merged

Add more docs about JWK support #341

merged 1 commit into from Sep 1, 2020

Conversation

take
Copy link
Contributor

@take take commented Nov 26, 2019

@sourcelevel-bot
Copy link

Hello, @take! This is your first Pull Request that will be reviewed by SourceLevel, an automatic Code Review service. It will leave comments on this diff with potential issues and style violations found in the code as you push new commits. You can also see all the issues found on this Pull Request on its review page. Please check our documentation for more information.

or by passing JWK as a simple Hash

```
jwks = { keys: [{ ... }] } # keys needs to be Symbol
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I added #348 to accept string keys. If that gets merged, this will need an update.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If it's okay for you I would merge this doc update. Then you can rebase your PR and add the new documentation information.

@take
Copy link
Contributor Author

take commented Mar 25, 2020

@bkeepers would help if you can look into this since there's relative PRs already 🙇

@excpt excpt merged commit d312d1d into jwt:master Sep 1, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants