Refactor copy to use opendir
#1028
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
RyanZim
reviewed
Nov 28, 2023
RyanZim
approved these changes
Dec 1, 2023
|
@SukkaW sorry for long delay! I appreciate the work! |
eventpush
pushed a commit
to Exponential-Workload/pkgs
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 1, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The PR closes #972.
The
readdirreturns the contents of a directory all at once, which can be slow (and blocking) when a directory contains many items. Theopendirreturns the contents of a directory one at a time.Unlike the original Node.js changes (which copy items one by one), this PR retains copy in parallel (as introduced in #1026).