Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Assume JWK is valid for signing if "use" is omitted #668

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Aug 12, 2021
Merged

Assume JWK is valid for signing if "use" is omitted #668

merged 2 commits into from Aug 12, 2021

Commits on Jul 6, 2021

  1. PyJWKClient: Assume JWK is intended for signing if 'use' claim is eit… 

    …her 'sig' or not present
    @Klavionik
    Klavionik committed Jul 6, 2021
    Copy the full SHA
    9e069e5 View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history

Commits on Aug 9, 2021

  1. Update CHANGELOG

    @Klavionik
    Klavionik committed Aug 9, 2021
    Copy the full SHA
    d5b517a View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history