Riemann Zeta Function Implemented #2950

Bobingstern · 2023-05-11T01:38:30Z

I implemented the original version of this issue without the Riemann Siegel Formulation for the critical strip. It includes the analytic continuation using Riemann's Functional Equation. All tests are passing with Real, Complex and Irrational numbers. Please let me know if I need to add or change anything.

josdejong

Wow, this looks good, thanks for working out this PR!

I made a couple of inline comments, can you have a look at those?

src/expression/embeddedDocs/function/special/riemannZeta.js

src/function/special/riemannZeta.js

josdejong · 2023-05-16T09:37:36Z

src/function/special/riemannZeta.js

@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+import { factory } from '../../utils/factory.js'
+
+const name = 'riemannZeta'


In Matlab and Mathematica for example you can use zeta. I see in your unit tests you prefer this short name zeta too. Is it an idea to just name the function zeta instead of riemannZeta?

I named it riemannZeta since there are a bunch of zeta functions out there that I didn't want to confuse with such as the Hurwitz Zeta function. Since the Riemann zeta is the most well known of the zeta functions I think it's okay to rename it to zeta and if subsequent zeta functions are implement to name them hurwitzZeta etc

It's a good point to make sure there will be no confusion. As far as I can see, Matlab uses zeta, Mathematica allows both zeta and riemannZeta, and Python combines both Riemann and and Hurwitz in a single function zeta, defaulting to Riemann (I personally would prefer to have two separate functions).

I'm OK with either one, what do you think is best?

I think zeta is more concise and most people will think of riemannZeta when looking at zeta. I have no idea how to implement a fast algorithm for the Hurwitz zeta function but I agree making them separate makes the most sense. Let's switch to just zeta

👍 sounds good

Still planning on renaming the function and files zeta?

src/function/special/riemannZeta.js

Bobingstern · 2023-05-20T00:45:03Z

I pushed out a new one with Big Number support and all of the changes listed above. All tests are passing and docs have been added too.

…develop

josdejong

The BigNumber support is awesome, thanks 😎 . I made a couple more inline comments, can you have a look at those?

josdejong · 2023-05-22T19:22:51Z

src/function/special/riemannZeta.js

+   *    math.zeta(math.i)  // returns 0.0033002..., -0.4181554491...i
+   *
+   *
+   * @param {number | Complex | BigNumber} s   A real or complex number


What would be a more informative description for the property s than "A real or complex number"? (missing BigNumber right now)

This should be fixed now in the newest commits

😂 well it's technically OK now. What I meant is that the description is not really a description, it only tells the type of s, but that is already documented.

It's like when you ask me "what do you have there?" and my answer is "steel and plastic". That can be technically correct. But a more helpful answer would be "a screwdriver". Explaining what kind of thing it is or what meaning it has.

Not a big deal though. I can't come up with something meaningful. Maybe "The numeric input for the zeta function" or so.

Oh I see what you are saying, sorry for the misunderstanding. I think I can come up something more descriptive

src/function/special/riemannZeta.js

types/index.d.ts

src/expression/embeddedDocs/function/special/riemannZeta.js

josdejong · 2023-05-22T19:31:20Z

src/function/special/riemannZeta.js

@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+import { factory } from '../../utils/factory.js'
+
+const name = 'riemannZeta'


Still planning on renaming the function and files zeta?

Bobingstern · 2023-05-23T12:10:58Z

For some reason I cant comment on the review. I think leaving the file names as riemannZeta and having the actual name to be just zeta would be better in the case of future versions implementing other zeta functions. If this is inconsistent to the other function then I can certainly change it. Also, I think you may have reviewed an older commit for the embedded docs since I have added those. The types have been updated too. The BigNumber aliases can be removed and reuse code if you think that is a better idea than duplicating the code for BigNumbers. I'm still fairly new to PRs so I apologise if I did something wrong with updating/fixing my code with GitHub

josdejong · 2023-05-26T12:20:42Z

Thanks for all the updates. I think we're about there. I made two more small remarks just to make sure we're on the same page.

For some reason I cant comment on the review.

hm that is odd. Maybe I wrongly created a second review with the second round of feedback, closing the first or so.

I think leaving the file names as riemannZeta and having the actual name to be just zeta would be better in the case of future versions implementing other zeta functions. If this is inconsistent to the other function then I can certainly change it.

I strongly prefer to keep the name of the actual function consistent with the names of the source files. I understand your reasoning but I think it will lead to confusion about whether riemannZeta is the same as zeta or not if they are mixed. Other future versions of zeta will simply have to pick a other, unique name like hurwitzZeta.

Bobingstern · 2023-05-26T12:27:34Z

Alright that makes sense to me, I'll rename the source files and add the changes you requests possibly over the weekend

josdejong · 2023-05-26T12:28:55Z

src/function/special/riemannZeta.js

+    if (x > -(n - 1) / 2) { return fBigNumber(x, n) }
+
+    // Function Equation for reflection to x < 1
+    let c = multiply(pow(2, x), pow(BigNumber(Math.PI), subtract(x, 1)))


This will not result in a true BigNumber version of pi. I think you can simply import pi instead? Or use the function createBigNumberPi?

josdejong · 2023-05-26T12:33:20Z

I see one unit test fails: https://github.com/josdejong/mathjs/actions/runs/5057022868/jobs/9149909403?pr=2950

Error: Required dependency "BigNumber" missing for factory "zeta" (suffix: Number)

I guess that is because in the number-only implementation of mathjs factoriesNumber.js, BigNumber does not exist. This can be solved in two ways:

Make the dependency optional, like '?BigNumber' and add a check before using it to see whether it is defined.
Rewrite the code so you don't need the BigNumber import: you can make zero by multiplying a variable from which you know it is a BigNumber by zero. You can create a BigNumber n by doing zero.add(n) where zero is a BigNumber, etc.

Bobingstern · 2023-05-26T16:45:23Z

How would I create a BigNumber of zero if I can't import the BigNumber though? Or is there a universal zero variable?

josdejong · 2023-05-26T19:38:37Z

// given that x is a BigNumber:
const zero = x.times(0)
const bn = zero.plus(n)

Bobingstern · 2023-05-26T22:52:45Z

I understand that, but how would I create x in the first place? I'm quite new to this so I apologize if this is a basic question

Bobingstern · 2023-05-27T00:04:51Z

Ok, I renamed all the files to zeta, updated the ts types, and I added a more descriptive explanation for s. I just need your help fixing the BigNumber in build-test.

josdejong · 2023-05-27T09:07:02Z

src/function/special/zeta.js

+      return NaN
+    }
+    // 15 decimals of accuracy
+    const n = 20


by default, BigNumbers are configured to have a precision of 64 digits. Can we utilize config.precision here?

josdejong · 2023-05-27T09:07:16Z

src/function/special/zeta.js

+    }
+    // 15 decimals of accuracy
+    const n = 20
+    if (x > -(n - 1) / 2) { return fBigNumber(x, n) }


There are still a few places where you implicitly convert a BigNumber into anumber, like x === 0 and x > -(n - 1) / 2. I think they cannot hurt in practice since n is small and integer, but it would be neat to use equal(x, 0) and larger(x, -(n - 1) / 2) I think.

josdejong · 2023-05-27T09:17:40Z

Ok, I renamed all the files to zeta, updated the ts types, and I added a more descriptive explanation for s. I just need your help fixing the BigNumber in build-test.

Thanks for the updates. No problem at all. Getting BigNumbers right requires some effort: we need to be careful not accidentally throwing away precision by mixing numbers into the equation, and also we need to be careful to respect the configured precision, and use pi with the right precision etc.

Zooming a bit out I see we basically have two implementations: for real numbers and for complex numbers. The real number implementation is currently named zetaBigNumber and still a bit hard coded for BigNumbers, but we can make it a really generic function that accepts both number and BigNumber. It may be good to put the real number implementation in a separate file (for internal use), and use that in the zeta implementation. In the number-only version of mathjs (factoriesNumber.js) we could refer to this generic implementation since it works fine with just numbers. Does that make sense?

If you want we can make this PR a joint effort, I can do this last step of refining the BigNumber implementation if you like.

Bobingstern · 2023-05-27T14:41:39Z

That would be fine with me! Do I need to change anything in order for you to modify the code in the pr?

josdejong · 2023-06-07T13:52:40Z

OK let's do that, I'll create a new feature branch from yours and work out the last details of the BigNumber implementation. I'll keep you posted.

* Riemann Zeta Function * Big Number zeta and added docs * Original algorithm paper credited * Update index.d.ts * Update riemannZeta.js * Update index.d.ts * Renamed files to reflect zeta * chore: make all the tests pass * chore: refactor `zeta` (WIP) * chore: reuse the validation logic of both number and BigNumber * fix: type definitions of `zeta` * fix: test the accuracy with numbers and BigNumbers (WIP) * chore: make linter happy * docs: fix example outputs * docs: update history * docs: update history * docs: describe the limited precision of `zeta` --------- Co-authored-by: BuildTools <anikpatel1322@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Anik Patel <74193405+Bobingstern@users.noreply.github.com>

josdejong · 2023-08-23T14:09:23Z

Closing in favor of #2975

Riemann Zeta Function

23b4819

josdejong requested changes May 16, 2023

View reviewed changes

Big Number zeta and added docs

b67e2c3

Bobingstern and others added 3 commits May 19, 2023 20:45

Merge branch 'develop' into develop

0c4aea5

Original algorithm paper credited

c507716

Merge branch 'develop' of https://github.com/Bobingstern/mathjs into …

1db74c1

…develop

josdejong requested changes May 22, 2023

View reviewed changes

Bobingstern added 4 commits May 23, 2023 07:53

Update index.d.ts

3ddb7dc

Update riemannZeta.js

19cbf65

Update index.d.ts

dc7db48

Merge branch 'develop' into develop

f1fa319

josdejong reviewed May 26, 2023

View reviewed changes

Renamed files to reflect zeta

59290c5

josdejong reviewed May 27, 2023

View reviewed changes

josdejong added 2 commits June 13, 2023 11:52

Merge branch 'develop' into develop

19aae26

Merge branch 'develop' into develop

2e67f57

josdejong mentioned this pull request Jun 20, 2023

Implement function Riemann Zeta #2975

Merged

3 tasks

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Riemann Zeta Function Implemented #2950

Riemann Zeta Function Implemented #2950

Bobingstern commented May 11, 2023

josdejong left a comment

josdejong May 16, 2023

Bobingstern May 16, 2023

josdejong May 16, 2023

Bobingstern May 16, 2023

josdejong May 16, 2023

josdejong May 22, 2023

Bobingstern commented May 20, 2023

josdejong left a comment

josdejong May 22, 2023

Bobingstern May 23, 2023

josdejong May 26, 2023

Bobingstern May 26, 2023

josdejong May 22, 2023

Bobingstern commented May 23, 2023

josdejong commented May 26, 2023

Bobingstern commented May 26, 2023

josdejong May 26, 2023

josdejong commented May 26, 2023

Bobingstern commented May 26, 2023

josdejong commented May 26, 2023

Bobingstern commented May 26, 2023

Bobingstern commented May 27, 2023

josdejong May 27, 2023

josdejong May 27, 2023

josdejong commented May 27, 2023

Bobingstern commented May 27, 2023

josdejong commented Jun 7, 2023

josdejong commented Aug 23, 2023

		@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
		import { factory } from '../../utils/factory.js'

		const name = 'riemannZeta'

Riemann Zeta Function Implemented #2950

Are you sure you want to change the base?

Riemann Zeta Function Implemented #2950

Conversation

Bobingstern commented May 11, 2023

josdejong left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Bobingstern commented May 20, 2023

josdejong left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Bobingstern commented May 23, 2023

josdejong commented May 26, 2023

Bobingstern commented May 26, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

josdejong commented May 26, 2023

Bobingstern commented May 26, 2023

josdejong commented May 26, 2023

Bobingstern commented May 26, 2023

Bobingstern commented May 27, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

josdejong commented May 27, 2023

Bobingstern commented May 27, 2023

josdejong commented Jun 7, 2023

josdejong commented Aug 23, 2023