-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Types/improve operator node types #2576
Types/improve operator node types #2576
Conversation
f24cef7
to
8826a66
Compare
I'm wondering now if I should make the |
Thanks, this makes sense.
That is a good point. Are there drawbacks to making the generic arguments optional? If so, we can schedule this as a breaking change for |
Hmm, yeah actually now that I think of it I believe we couldn't do the fancy check that ensures a valid
Should we leave this whole PR until then, or should I create "watered down" version for now where |
Nice 🤩 |
Published now in v10.6.1 |
This PR adds generic
op
andfn
args toOperatorNode
type to solve the problems laid out hereAddresses #2575