Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Re introduced Docker image cache improvments from #6744 #8413

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 28, 2018

Conversation

smasset
Copy link
Contributor

@smasset smasset commented Sep 28, 2018

These improvements were lost when merging #7722.

@gclayburg, @PierreBesson was this intentional. If not, please refer to #6744 for explanation.

  • Please make sure the below checklist is followed for Pull Requests.

  • Travis tests are green

  • Tests are added where necessary

  • Documentation is added/updated where necessary

  • Coding Rules & Commit Guidelines as per our CONTRIBUTING.md document are followed

@pascalgrimaud
Copy link
Member

Thanks @smasset
I'm merging this, but not sure it is used now. Do you see this PR #8409 ?

@pascalgrimaud pascalgrimaud merged commit 4101f33 into jhipster:master Sep 28, 2018
@PierreBesson
Copy link
Contributor

I don't understand. Now that we have migrated to jib, we should not have a Dockerfile anymore, the file should be removed.

@pascalgrimaud
Copy link
Member

The real PR is #8352

@PierreBesson : see @danielpetisme's question, we didn't answer, so that's why the file is still here:

Should I remove the existing Dockerfile?
Same as above, Devs are comfortable with it so removing the file right now can be a bit too agressive. Plus I didn't check yet if it's not used somewhere else.

@smasset
Copy link
Contributor Author

smasset commented Sep 29, 2018

Wow, that was quick. Thanks.
@pascalgrimaud, I'll check the mentioned PR.

@jdubois jdubois added this to the 5.4.0 milestone Oct 3, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants