Update dependency esbuild to v0.21.3 - autoclosed

[renovate]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Change	Age	Adoption	Passing	Confidence
esbuild	0.21.1 -> 0.21.3

---

Release Notes

evanw/esbuild (esbuild)

v0.21.3

Compare Source

• Implement the decorator metadata proposal (#​3760)

  This release implements the decorator metadata proposal, which is a sub-proposal of the decorators proposal. Microsoft shipped the decorators proposal in TypeScript 5.0 and the decorator metadata proposal in TypeScript 5.2, so it's important that esbuild also supports both of these features. Here's a quick example:

  // Shim the "Symbol.metadata" symbol
  Symbol.metadata ??= Symbol('Symbol.metadata')
  
  const track = (_, context) => {
    (context.metadata.names ||= []).push(context.name)
  }
  
  class Foo {
    @​track foo = 1
    @​track bar = 2
  }
  
  // Prints ["foo", "bar"]
  console.log(Foo[Symbol.metadata].names)

  ⚠️ WARNING ⚠️

  This proposal has been marked as "stage 3" which means "recommended for implementation". However, it's still a work in progress and isn't a part of JavaScript yet, so keep in mind that any code that uses JavaScript decorator metadata may need to be updated as the feature continues to evolve. If/when that happens, I will update esbuild's implementation to match the specification. I will not be supporting old versions of the specification.

• Fix bundled decorators in derived classes (#​3768)

  In certain cases, bundling code that uses decorators in a derived class with a class body that references its own class name could previously generate code that crashes at run-time due to an incorrect variable name. This problem has been fixed. Here is an example of code that was compiled incorrectly before this fix:

  class Foo extends Object {
    @​(x => x) foo() {
      return Foo
    }
  }
  console.log(new Foo().foo())

• Fix tsconfig.json files inside symlinked directories (#​3767)

  This release fixes an issue with a scenario involving a tsconfig.json file that extends another file from within a symlinked directory that uses the paths feature. In that case, the implicit baseURL value should be based on the real path (i.e. after expanding all symbolic links) instead of the original path. This was already done for other files that esbuild resolves but was not yet done for tsconfig.json because it's special-cased (the regular path resolver can't be used because the information inside tsconfig.json is involved in path resolution). Note that this fix no longer applies if the --preserve-symlinks setting is enabled.

v0.21.2

Compare Source

• Correct this in field and accessor decorators (#​3761)

  This release changes the value of this in initializers for class field and accessor decorators from the module-level this value to the appropriate this value for the decorated element (either the class or the instance). It was previously incorrect due to lack of test coverage. Here's an example of a decorator that doesn't work without this change:

  const dec = () => function() { this.bar = true }
  class Foo { @​dec static foo }
  console.log(Foo.bar) // Should be "true"

• Allow es2023 as a target environment (#​3762)

  TypeScript recently added es2023 as a compilation target, so esbuild now supports this too. There is no difference between a target of es2022 and es2023 as far as esbuild is concerned since the 2023 edition of JavaScript doesn't introduce any new syntax features.

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am on Monday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

[changeset-bot]

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 3fffbb9

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR