Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue #6205 - Fix issues with OpenID redirecting to wrong URI (#6211) #6245

Merged
merged 1 commit into from May 12, 2021

Conversation

lachlan-roberts
Copy link
Contributor

Issue #6205

Merge of the changes from PR #6211 back to 9.4.x branch.

@lachlan-roberts lachlan-roberts added this to In progress in Jetty 9.4.41 via automation May 12, 2021
sbordet
sbordet previously approved these changes May 12, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@sbordet sbordet left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@lachlan-roberts just a small nit to fix before merging, otherwise LGTM.

private static final int MAX_SIZE = 64;

@Override
protected boolean removeEldestEntry(Map.Entry eldest)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Missing type parameters, should be Map.Entry<String, UriRedirectInfo>

Jetty 9.4.41 automation moved this from In progress to Reviewer approved May 12, 2021
Use the OpenID state param to map to the redirect URI.
Jetty 9.4.41 automation moved this from Reviewer approved to Review in progress May 12, 2021
Jetty 9.4.41 automation moved this from Review in progress to Reviewer approved May 12, 2021
@sbordet sbordet merged commit 2e7f5eb into jetty-9.4.x May 12, 2021
Jetty 9.4.41 automation moved this from Reviewer approved to Done May 12, 2021
@sbordet sbordet deleted the jetty-9.4.x-6205-OpenID branch May 12, 2021 14:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
No open projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants