New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Issue #5086 Review and rework o.e.j.util.Scanner #5744
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
4883332
Issue #5086 Review and rework o.e.j.util.Scanner
janbartel 4304c78
Issue #5086 Improve ScannerTest
janbartel 115a72d
Issue #5086 Fix checkstyle in test
janbartel 90e48ba
Issue #5086 Fix javadoc
janbartel 31cc298
Issue #5086 Changes after review
janbartel e39ec6c
Issue #5086 Fix error on addFile
janbartel c776eeb
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/jetty-10.0.x' into jetty-10.0.x-…
janbartel 8fe8cb8
Issue #5086 Add blocking method for immediate scan.
janbartel 97b3f26
Fixed scan(Callback) bug, returning early in case of failures.
sbordet fe0e076
Using capital case for static final field.
sbordet 9c882ee
Improved KeyStoreScanner.scan().
sbordet File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@sbordet this will return true even if the callback fails, which is a bit strange.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@gregw I don't understand? If the 10 s elapsed,
complete.await()
would have returnedfalse
, and the return value would have been ignored. Now we return it so that a JMX call to this method would know if it timed out.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Scan is passed a callback. If it is failed then this method should return false. Moreover I think if it times out then I think this method should throw a timeout exception rather than return
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@sbordet ^
Also I don't like the 10second wait either, but not sure how to avoid other than infinite wait