Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: upgrade to typescript@4 #650

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Aug 24, 2020
Merged

chore: upgrade to typescript@4 #650

merged 1 commit into from Aug 24, 2020

Conversation

G-Rath
Copy link
Collaborator

@G-Rath G-Rath commented Aug 22, 2020

no-focused-tests could probably use a rewrite using the utils, but it works so 馃し

@G-Rath
Copy link
Collaborator Author

G-Rath commented Aug 23, 2020

Linting breaks because of changes to tuples in TS, which was fixed in typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#2197 but I'm guessing was released in v3 :(

@G-Rath G-Rath changed the base branch from master to next August 23, 2020 02:05
@SimenB
Copy link
Member

SimenB commented Aug 23, 2020

Linting breaks

What do you mean? CI seems happy?

@G-Rath
Copy link
Collaborator Author

G-Rath commented Aug 23, 2020

That's because I changed the base branch to next :)

Check out this action run.

@SimenB
Copy link
Member

SimenB commented Aug 23, 2020

Aha, right! Should we wait for official v4 support (typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#2260 (comment))?

@SimenB SimenB merged commit 27944cf into next Aug 24, 2020
@SimenB SimenB deleted the update-to-typescript-4 branch August 24, 2020 17:10
SimenB pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 24, 2020
SimenB pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 24, 2020
SimenB pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 31, 2020
SimenB pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2020
SimenB pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants