Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use BOM, and adapt to a change in GitSCM behavior #78

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 17, 2021

Conversation

jglick
Copy link
Member

@jglick jglick commented Feb 16, 2021

Noticed in jenkinsci/bom#431 that jenkinsci/git-plugin#1043 broke a longstanding test here (which ultimately should probably be rewritten to use some mock describables). Switching to the BOM and just temporarily overriding the git plugin version. Supersedes #58, #73, #74, #76, and #77.

@timja
Copy link
Member

timja commented Feb 16, 2021

spotbugs issues on new core / spotbugs FTR

@jglick
Copy link
Member Author

jglick commented Feb 16, 2021

Yeah I know, I will fix shortly.

@jglick jglick added the chore label Feb 16, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@MarkEWaite MarkEWaite left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

I assume this was an unavoidable break unless I left the @DataBoundConstructor of the GitSCM class unmodified. The change for the @DataBoundConstructor makes the Pipeline syntax clearer and removes an ancient undocumented experimental git plugin code.

@jetersen
Copy link
Member

@jglick instead of supersedes block.

Consider using the keywords in the description

Closes #58 
Closes #73
Closes #74
Closes #76
Closes #77

@jglick
Copy link
Member Author

jglick commented Feb 16, 2021

Consider using the keywords in the description

I know about that, but it is unnecessary for Dependabot since it will automatically close superseded PRs.

@jetersen
Copy link
Member

Right 😅 Didn't check the PRs just saw the block and thought phew forgetting to close the PRs would create noise my bad for interjecting.

@jglick
Copy link
Member Author

jglick commented Feb 16, 2021

@car-roll could we get a release of this, to unblock bom updates?

@car-roll car-roll merged commit d511e73 into jenkinsci:master Feb 17, 2021
@jglick jglick deleted the bom branch February 17, 2021 12:01
@jglick
Copy link
Member Author

jglick commented Feb 17, 2021

Guess not. This is the kind of plugin that would be a good candidate for JEP-229…

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
6 participants