Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

move the header parts in a taglib #9223

Merged
merged 1 commit into from May 18, 2024

Conversation

mawinter69
Copy link
Contributor

@mawinter69 mawinter69 commented May 2, 2024

the taglib allows plugins to make use of the searchbox and the login stuff while easily being able to modify all the other aspects of the header.

Testing done

Manually verified that the header is not modified. Also in the downstream PR using the taglib works without problems.

see jenkinsci/customizable-header-plugin#101

Proposed changelog entries

  • Provide header parts as a tag library.

Proposed upgrade guidelines

N/A

Submitter checklist

Edit tasklist title
Beta Give feedback Tasklist Submitter checklist, more options

Delete tasklist

Delete tasklist block?
Are you sure? All relationships in this tasklist will be removed.
  1. The Jira issue, if it exists, is well-described.
    Options
  2. The changelog entries and upgrade guidelines are appropriate for the audience affected by the change (users or developers, depending on the change) and are in the imperative mood (see examples). Fill in the Proposed upgrade guidelines section only if there are breaking changes or changes that may require extra steps from users during upgrade.
    Options
  3. There is automated testing or an explanation as to why this change has no tests.
    Options
  4. New public classes, fields, and methods are annotated with @Restricted or have @since TODO Javadocs, as appropriate.
    Options
  5. New deprecations are annotated with @Deprecated(since = "TODO") or @Deprecated(forRemoval = true, since = "TODO"), if applicable.
    Options
  6. New or substantially changed JavaScript is not defined inline and does not call eval to ease future introduction of Content Security Policy (CSP) directives (see documentation).
    Options
  7. For dependency updates, there are links to external changelogs and, if possible, full differentials.
    Options
  8. For new APIs and extension points, there is a link to at least one consumer.
    Options

Before the changes are marked as ready-for-merge:

Maintainer checklist

Edit tasklist title
Beta Give feedback Tasklist Maintainer checklist, more options

Delete tasklist

Delete tasklist block?
Are you sure? All relationships in this tasklist will be removed.
  1. There are at least two (2) approvals for the pull request and no outstanding requests for change.
    Options
  2. Conversations in the pull request are over, or it is explicit that a reviewer is not blocking the change.
    Options
  3. Changelog entries in the pull request title and/or Proposed changelog entries are accurate, human-readable, and in the imperative mood.
    Options
  4. Proper changelog labels are set so that the changelog can be generated automatically.
    Options
  5. If the change needs additional upgrade steps from users, the upgrade-guide-needed label is set and there is a Proposed upgrade guidelines section in the pull request title (see example).
    Options
  6. If it would make sense to backport the change to LTS, a Jira issue must exist, be a Bug or Improvement, and be labeled as lts-candidate to be considered (see query).
    Options

the taglib allows plugins to make use of the searchbox and the login
stuff while easily being able to modify all the other aspects of the
header.
Comment on lines +4 to +6
<h:logo/>
<h:searchbox/>
<h:login/>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is now public API. Are we confident a redesign doesn't just randomly change this anytime soon?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Any substantial change to the header would require a change of the header version in the PartialHeader so that plugins need to react. I might need to stick to the PartialHeader in the PR of my plugin (which is so far the only implementation of a header) https://github.com/jenkinsci/customizable-header-plugin/blob/295683015391e800be41c568b42ac80f6fd7c61b/src/main/java/io/jenkins/plugins/customizable_header/headers/LogoHeader.java#L9

@timja timja added developer Changes which impact plugin developers rfe For changelog: Minor enhancement. use `major-rfe` for changes to be highlighted labels May 8, 2024
Copy link
Member

@timja timja left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Makes sense, downstream changes look good

@timja timja requested a review from a team May 9, 2024 06:50
@timja
Copy link
Member

timja commented May 11, 2024

/label ready-for-merge


This PR is now ready for merge, after ~24 hours, we will merge it if there's no negative feedback.

Thanks!

@comment-ops-bot comment-ops-bot bot added the ready-for-merge The PR is ready to go, and it will be merged soon if there is no negative feedback label May 11, 2024
@MarkEWaite MarkEWaite merged commit c0c1999 into jenkinsci:master May 18, 2024
16 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
developer Changes which impact plugin developers ready-for-merge The PR is ready to go, and it will be merged soon if there is no negative feedback rfe For changelog: Minor enhancement. use `major-rfe` for changes to be highlighted
Projects
None yet
5 participants