Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert PR #1192 #1224

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 18, 2022
Merged

Revert PR #1192 #1224

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 18, 2022

Conversation

kfcampbell
Copy link
Member

@kfcampbell kfcampbell commented Jul 18, 2022

See #1192 and #1222 for context. PR #1192 broke repository collaborator non-custom roles.

Fixes #1222.

@kfcampbell kfcampbell merged commit ce4c046 into integrations:main Jul 18, 2022
@kfcampbell kfcampbell deleted the revert-1162 branch July 18, 2022 23:55
@bpaquet
Copy link
Contributor

bpaquet commented Jul 19, 2022

Sorry for the binary @kfcampbell . The issue with collaborator seems to be in #1192, not in mine. Should I propose my PR a second time (with no binary :))?

@kfcampbell
Copy link
Member Author

My goodness, I've had a rough day. My mistake, please do that and I'll get it merged! Off to revert the other breaking PR now...

@kfcampbell kfcampbell changed the title Revert PR #1162 Revert PR #1192 Jul 19, 2022
@kfcampbell
Copy link
Member Author

🤦 @bpaquet, your changes are still merged and no further action from you is required. I mixed up PR #1192 and #1162: PR #1192 was reverted as expected and I mentioned the wrong PR here. Apologies for the confusion.

kfcampbell added a commit to kfcampbell/terraform-provider-github that referenced this pull request Jul 26, 2022
kfcampbell added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 6, 2022
* Refactor out branches attribute from resource_github_repository and data_source_github_repository

to data_source_github_repository_branches

* Add link to docs

* Update github/data_source_github_repository_branches.go

Co-authored-by: mareksapota-lyft <msapota@lyft.com>

* Add only_protected_branches in data source github_repository (#1162)

This will allow to retrieve only the protected branches instead of the first 30.

Co-authored-by: Keegan Campbell <me@kfcampbell.com>

* Remove mistakenly committed binary (#1223)

* Revert PR #1162 (#1224)

* marek's suggestion + use v47

Co-authored-by: mareksapota-lyft <msapota@lyft.com>
Co-authored-by: Bertrand Paquet <bertrand.paquet@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Keegan Campbell <me@kfcampbell.com>
kazaker pushed a commit to auto1-oss/terraform-provider-github that referenced this pull request Dec 28, 2022
* Refactor out branches attribute from resource_github_repository and data_source_github_repository

to data_source_github_repository_branches

* Add link to docs

* Update github/data_source_github_repository_branches.go

Co-authored-by: mareksapota-lyft <msapota@lyft.com>

* Add only_protected_branches in data source github_repository (integrations#1162)

This will allow to retrieve only the protected branches instead of the first 30.

Co-authored-by: Keegan Campbell <me@kfcampbell.com>

* Remove mistakenly committed binary (integrations#1223)

* Revert PR integrations#1162 (integrations#1224)

* marek's suggestion + use v47

Co-authored-by: mareksapota-lyft <msapota@lyft.com>
Co-authored-by: Bertrand Paquet <bertrand.paquet@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Keegan Campbell <me@kfcampbell.com>
avidspartan1 pushed a commit to avidspartan1/terraform-provider-github that referenced this pull request Feb 5, 2024
* Refactor out branches attribute from resource_github_repository and data_source_github_repository

to data_source_github_repository_branches

* Add link to docs

* Update github/data_source_github_repository_branches.go

Co-authored-by: mareksapota-lyft <msapota@lyft.com>

* Add only_protected_branches in data source github_repository (integrations#1162)

This will allow to retrieve only the protected branches instead of the first 30.

Co-authored-by: Keegan Campbell <me@kfcampbell.com>

* Remove mistakenly committed binary (integrations#1223)

* Revert PR integrations#1162 (integrations#1224)

* marek's suggestion + use v47

Co-authored-by: mareksapota-lyft <msapota@lyft.com>
Co-authored-by: Bertrand Paquet <bertrand.paquet@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Keegan Campbell <me@kfcampbell.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Use GetRoleName() instead of permission mapping not backward compatible.
2 participants