Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix the expected/actual value ordering in a few unit test asserts #627

Merged
merged 1 commit into from May 11, 2021

Conversation

Numpsy
Copy link
Contributor

@Numpsy Numpsy commented May 8, 2021

rather trivial, but still

I certify that I own, and have sufficient rights to contribute, all source code and related material intended to be compiled or integrated with the source code for the SharpZipLib open source product (the "Contribution"). My Contribution is licensed under the MIT License.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 8, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #627 (e723cce) into master (34879be) will decrease coverage by 0.11%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #627      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   73.35%   73.23%   -0.12%     
==========================================
  Files          68       68              
  Lines        8721     8721              
==========================================
- Hits         6397     6387      -10     
- Misses       2324     2334      +10     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...ICSharpCode.SharpZipLib/BZip2/BZip2OutputStream.cs 78.40% <0.00%> (-1.13%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 34879be...e723cce. Read the comment docs.

@Numpsy
Copy link
Contributor Author

Numpsy commented May 9, 2021

Not sure what's going on with the coverage results - this shouldn't effect coverage at all, even less so in BZip2OutputStream

@piksel
Copy link
Member

piksel commented May 11, 2021

No, there is something really odd going on. I have tried fixing it by reducing the amount of test coverage results being uploaded, but it's still bonkers.

@piksel piksel merged commit c65486c into icsharpcode:master May 11, 2021
@Numpsy Numpsy deleted the rw/tests/nuit_analyzers branch May 11, 2021 11:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants