WIP Connectionless Verification POC

[mineme0110]

Overview

Fixes ATL-6420

Checklist

My PR contains...

• No code changes (changes to documentation, CI, metadata, etc.)
• Bug fixes (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• Improvements (misc. changes to existing features)
• Features (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

My changes...

• are breaking changes
• are not breaking changes
• If yes to above: I have updated the documentation accordingly

Documentation

• My changes do not require a change to the project documentation
• My changes require a change to the project documentation
• If yes to above: I have updated the documentation accordingly

Tests

• My changes can not or do not need to be tested
• My changes can and should be tested by unit and/or integration tests
• If yes to above: I have added tests to cover my changes
• If yes to above: I have taken care to cover edge cases in my tests

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
15 New issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
2.4% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[github-actions]

Integration Test Results

12 files  ±0  12 suites  ±0   2s ⏱️ ±0s
25 tests ±0  25 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
26 runs  ±0  26 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 7dd994d. ± Comparison against base commit 4e3aaa3.

[github-actions]

Unit Test Results

 66 files   -  20   66 suites   - 20   16m 15s ⏱️ - 3m 0s
541 tests  - 193  533 ✅  - 193  8 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
543 runs   - 196  535 ✅  - 196  8 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 7dd994d. ± Comparison against base commit 4e3aaa3.

This pull request removes 193 tests.

io.iohk.atala.mercury.protocol.presentproof.PresentationSpec ‑ Verifier Presentation
io.iohk.atala.mercury.protocol.presentproof.ProposePresentationSpec ‑ Prover Propose Presentation
io.iohk.atala.mercury.protocol.presentproof.RequestCredentialSpec ‑ Verifier Request Presentation
io.iohk.atala.pollux.core.model.presentation.PresentationAttachmentSpec ‑ Verifier Request Presentation Attachment
io.iohk.atala.pollux.core.model.schema.AnoncredSchemaTypeSpec ‑ AnoncredSchemaTypeTest - should fail for attrName not unique
io.iohk.atala.pollux.core.model.schema.AnoncredSchemaTypeSpec ‑ AnoncredSchemaTypeTest - should fail for having more than 125 attributes
io.iohk.atala.pollux.core.model.schema.AnoncredSchemaTypeSpec ‑ AnoncredSchemaTypeTest - should fail for having null value
io.iohk.atala.pollux.core.model.schema.AnoncredSchemaTypeSpec ‑ AnoncredSchemaTypeTest - should fail for incorrect type
io.iohk.atala.pollux.core.model.schema.AnoncredSchemaTypeSpec ‑ AnoncredSchemaTypeTest - should fail for not having at least 1 attribute
io.iohk.atala.pollux.core.model.schema.AnoncredSchemaTypeSpec ‑ AnoncredSchemaTypeTest - should fail for not having least 1 characters long
…

[bvoiturier]

Awesome work @mineme0110!! 👍

[bvoiturier]

I would consider reusing the existing case class (i.e. PresentationStatus) and not duplicate here. I find it confusing for the end-user, and as far as I can see, the only difference is the inner invitation attribute, which is present or not, whether it's an OOB or not. The goal_code and goal attributes at the top are specific to OOB and could easily be exposed as properties of the inner invitation.