chore(deps): update dependency @openzeppelin/contracts [security]

[renovate]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Change
@​openzeppelin/contracts	3.4.2 -> 4.4.1
@​openzeppelin/contracts	4.4.1 -> 4.4.2

GitHub Vulnerability Alerts

GHSA-9c22-pwxw-p6hx

Impact

Initializer functions that are invoked separate from contract creation (the most prominent example being minimal proxies) may be reentered if they make an untrusted non-view external call.

Once an initializer has finished running it can never be re-executed. However, an exception put in place to support multiple inheritance made reentrancy possible in the scenario described above, breaking the expectation that there is a single execution.

Note that upgradeable proxies are commonly initialized together with contract creation, where reentrancy is not feasible, so the impact of this issue is believed to be minor.

Patches

A fix is included in the version v4.4.1 of @openzeppelin/contracts and @openzeppelin/contracts-upgradeable.

Workarounds

Avoid untrusted external calls during initialization.

References

OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts#3006

Credits

This issue was identified and reported by @​chaitinblockchain through our bug bounty on Immunefi.

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory, or need assistance executing the mitigation, email us at security@openzeppelin.com.

CVE-2021-46320

In OpenZeppelin <=v4.4.0, initializer functions that are invoked separate from contract creation (the most prominent example being minimal proxies) may be reentered if they make an untrusted non-view external call. Once an initializer has finished running it can never be re-executed. However, an exception put in place to support multiple inheritance made reentrancy possible, breaking the expectation that there is a single execution.

GHSA-m6w8-fq7v-ph4m

Impact

The GovernorCompatibilityBravo module may lead to the creation of governance proposals that execute function calls with incorrect arguments due to bad ABI encoding. This happens if the proposal is created using explicit function signatures, e.g. a proposal to invoke the function foo(uint256) is created as propose([target], [0], ["foo(uint256)"], ["0x00..01"]). If the function selector is provided as part of the encoded proposal data the issue is not present, e.g. the same proposal is created as propose([target], [0], ["0x2fbebd3800..01"]), where 2fbebd38 is the function selector.

We've assessed the instances of this contract found on chain, and did not find any occurrence of this bug in the past. Proposal creation through Tally or OpenZeppelin Defender is not affected. The core Governor contract on its own is not affected.

Patches

A fix is included in version v4.4.2 of @openzeppelin/contracts and @openzeppelin/contracts-upgradeable.

Workarounds

Do not create proposals using explicit function signatures. Instead, use the propose function without the signatures argument, and create the proposal using the fully ABI-encoded function call including the function selector in the calldatas argument as explained above.

References

OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts#3099

Credits

This issue was identified and reported by @​GeraldHost.

For more information

If you have any questions, comments, or need assistance regarding this advisory, email us at security@openzeppelin.com.

To submit security reports please use our bug bounty on Immunefi.

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: "" (UTC).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, click this checkbox.

---

This PR has been generated by WhiteSource Renovate. View repository job log here.