refactor(lib): use non_exhaustive macro for future field expanding instead of manual implementation #678
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
dswij
approved these changes
Feb 17, 2024
tottoto
force-pushed
the
non-exhaustive
branch
from
960d5dc
to
62e07da
Compare
…stead of manual implementation
tottoto
force-pushed
the
non-exhaustive
branch
from
62e07da
to
61eaea9
Compare
svix-jplatte
approved these changes
Mar 6, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uses
non_exhaustivemacro for future field expanding instead of manual implementation.