Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement runtime data for Plugwise #117172

Merged
merged 6 commits into from May 13, 2024
Merged

Conversation

bouwew
Copy link
Contributor

@bouwew bouwew commented May 10, 2024

Proposed change

Implement runtime data for Plugwise.

And apparently some migration-code was not added in the past, the tests fails on it in this PR, so added.
Looks like this is caused by the SENSOR_DOMAIN to Platform.SENSOR change.

Also some small test-fixture errors were corrected.

Type of change

  • Dependency upgrade
  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New integration (thank you!)
  • New feature (which adds functionality to an existing integration)
  • Deprecation (breaking change to happen in the future)
  • Breaking change (fix/feature causing existing functionality to break)
  • Code quality improvements to existing code or addition of tests

Additional information

  • This PR fixes or closes issue: fixes #
  • This PR is related to issue:
  • Link to documentation pull request:

Checklist

  • The code change is tested and works locally.
  • Local tests pass. Your PR cannot be merged unless tests pass
  • There is no commented out code in this PR.
  • I have followed the development checklist
  • I have followed the perfect PR recommendations
  • The code has been formatted using Ruff (ruff format homeassistant tests)
  • Tests have been added to verify that the new code works.

If user exposed functionality or configuration variables are added/changed:

If the code communicates with devices, web services, or third-party tools:

  • The manifest file has all fields filled out correctly.
    Updated and included derived files by running: python3 -m script.hassfest.
  • New or updated dependencies have been added to requirements_all.txt.
    Updated by running python3 -m script.gen_requirements_all.
  • For the updated dependencies - a link to the changelog, or at minimum a diff between library versions is added to the PR description.
  • Untested files have been added to .coveragerc.

To help with the load of incoming pull requests:

@home-assistant
Copy link

Hey there @CoMPaTech, @frenck, mind taking a look at this pull request as it has been labeled with an integration (plugwise) you are listed as a code owner for? Thanks!

Code owner commands

Code owners of plugwise can trigger bot actions by commenting:

  • @home-assistant close Closes the pull request.
  • @home-assistant rename Awesome new title Renames the pull request.
  • @home-assistant reopen Reopen the pull request.
  • @home-assistant unassign plugwise Removes the current integration label and assignees on the pull request, add the integration domain after the command.
  • @home-assistant add-label needs-more-information Add a label (needs-more-information, problem in dependency, problem in custom component) to the pull request.
  • @home-assistant remove-label needs-more-information Remove a label (needs-more-information, problem in dependency, problem in custom component) on the pull request.

@bouwew bouwew marked this pull request as ready for review May 10, 2024 11:02
@bouwew bouwew requested a review from frenck as a code owner May 10, 2024 11:02
@frenck frenck merged commit 84cc650 into home-assistant:dev May 13, 2024
24 checks passed
@bouwew bouwew deleted the pw_runtime_data branch May 13, 2024 08:09
@@ -59,6 +59,12 @@ def async_migrate_entity_entry(entry: er.RegistryEntry) -> dict[str, Any] | None
"-slave_boiler_state", "-secondary_boiler_state"
)
}
if entry.domain == Platform.SENSOR and entry.unique_id.endswith(
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't understand why we add this or why we change tests in this PR. It should just be a refactor.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

After implementing the refactor some tests failed.
I needed to add the below code and update the test-file to obtain a test-pass.
I'm seeing these strange issues, tests passing when they should fail, quite regularly in our Plugwise-beta github. This I normally resolve by deleting the caches under Actions - Caches.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If tests need to be adjusted that should happen separately. A refactor shouldn't change the test result. Then the tests aren't correctly written.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 15, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants