Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

inspect_template_name changed from required to optional #5741

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

changed inspect_template_name from required to optional and added test cases.
fixes hashicorp/terraform-provider-google#11858

If this PR is for Terraform, I acknowledge that I have:

  • Searched through the issue tracker for an open issue that this either resolves or contributes to, commented on it to claim it, and written "fixes {url}" or "part of {url}" in this PR description. If there were no relevant open issues, I opened one and commented that I would like to work on it (not necessary for very small changes).
  • Ensured that all new fields I added that can be set by a user appear in at least one example (for generated resources) or third_party test (for handwritten resources or update tests).
  • Generated Terraform providers, and ran make test and make lint in the generated providers to ensure it passes unit and linter tests.
  • Ran relevant acceptance tests using my own Google Cloud project and credentials (If the acceptance tests do not yet pass or you are unable to run them, please let your reviewer know).
  • Read the Release Notes Guide before writing my release note below.

Release Note Template for Downstream PRs (will be copied)

dlp: changed `inspect_template_name` field from required to optional in `google_data_loss_prevention_job_trigger` resource

Derived from GoogleCloudPlatform/magic-modules#8036

* inspect_template_name changed to optional from required

* changed random string func and config in test

Signed-off-by: Modular Magician <magic-modules@google.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
1 participant