Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a loading option #958

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

joshleblanc
Copy link

This adds a loading option to the table. It defaults to false.

When true, it adds a loader on top of the current table.

ZnjLHg3p3n

This is to facilitate server-side data loading.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Sep 25, 2019

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.08%) to 76.715% when pulling 9107a9a on joshleblanc:custom-table-body into f0ea9e5 on gregnb:master.

@loktar00
Copy link

loktar00 commented Sep 25, 2019

The same can be accomplished (visually) by providing a loader (custom ect.) Right before <MUIDataTable/>

Quick dirty example using the serverside pagination example, as an example.

const loadingComponent = (
      <div style={{position: 'absolute', zIndex: 110, top: 0, left: 0, width: '100%', height: '100%', display: 'flex', justifyContent: 'center', alignItems: 'center', background: 'rgba(255,255,255,0.8)'}}>
        <CircularProgress size={24} />
      </div>
    );

    return (
      <div style={{position:'relative'}}>
        {isLoading && loadingComponent}
        <MUIDataTable title={<Typography variant="title">
          ACME Employee list
          </Typography>
          } data={data} columns={columns} options={options} />
      </div>
    );

@gabrielliwerant
Copy link
Collaborator

This isn't a feature that I think should be supported at this time. It has come up a few times (Eg: #361 & #466). It's easy enough to add this in and around the table without making it core functionality (see serverside-pagination example).

The library needs to leave out some things to keep it from becoming bloating and overcomplicated. When it comes to additional component rendering, I think it's best left to custom renders or author-provided functionality.

@gabrielliwerant gabrielliwerant added the wontfix Support for this request is not planned at this time label Sep 25, 2019
@anthonywebb
Copy link

@gabrielliwerant it would be helpful in your serverside-pagination example if the loading indicator placement was not covered/hidden by the search box. Sure adding it outside the "paper" works, but does not feel right. I think a useful example of this as the example you reference attempts to be would be a good starting point for those wanting to elegantly add a loading indicator.

@gabrielliwerant
Copy link
Collaborator

gabrielliwerant commented Oct 3, 2019

@anthonywebb Agreed, the examples provided are not the best. Would you have any interest in submitting something to enhance the example? I created an issue for this and linked it here.

@thefat32
Copy link

thefat32 commented May 5, 2021

As opposed to what has being said in this thread. I think load state should be part of server-side data source support. +1 to get this implemented.

Thanks for this awesome lib btw!

@ShawnXU0208
Copy link

I also want to have this feature added, I am trying to have a loading indicator appear in the center of table body, and while it is showing, all the actions (changing page, filters, search) should be disabled, there is currently no easy way to do this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

8 participants