New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Memory leak #138
Comments
Thanks for filling and opening a new issue. I'm not certain that your proposed workaround will fix this leak. Looking up existing issues on the Maps SDK issue tracker, it appears that this might be an issue on the Maps SDK itself and independent of Maps Compose. See https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/219068016 |
@arriolac it is true that it won't fix the very long-term google maps SDK issue, but that issue leaks a few kb of internal memory (can be fixed with weak references). That is a different leak. However, this issue leaks multiple megabytes because nothing is being cleared. I have this tested in AS and also in production where this fix brought the average memory used down from 450MB to 140MB. I am using the same thing for camerax compose android view. If you do call OnDispose and that removes the lifecycle before the activity is killed, the lifecycle onDestroy is never called even if activity onDestroy is called. There is a memory leak android-maps-compose/maps-compose/src/main/java/com/google/maps/android/compose/GoogleMap.kt Line 170 in e4e6796
That can happen often. A similar issue that causes onDestroy not to be called because of the same lifecycle that here causes memory leaks is discussed here google/accompanist#978 Might also be similar to android/camera-samples#352 that google maps is keeping something on a separate process, which then causes a leak if stuff isn't cleared. Actually I think this is the cause (leaking the few kb of google maps memory), but in this case if we don't clear the other things in google maps it will also leak the activity and application which is few MB. |
* LazyColumn 안에서 스크롤 해서 NaverMap이 안 보이는 시점에 메모리 해제가 되지 않아 메모리릭이 발생하는 현상, AnimatedNavHost 안에서 NaverMap을 사용할 때 onDestroy()가 호출되지 않는 현상을 해결하기 위해 코드를 수정합니다. * Update naver-map-compose/src/main/java/com/naver/maps/map/compose/NaverMap.kt Co-authored-by: Sungyong An <soupyong@gmail.com> * googlemaps/android-maps-compose#138 과 비슷하게 코드를 수정합니다. Co-authored-by: Sungyong An <soupyong@gmail.com>
Can you provide some repro steps? Would be great if we can validate this in the sample app included in the repro and verify that your proposed fix addresses it. |
@arriolac this is a pretty standard project, where there is a map, marker and clicking the marker goes to other screen, clicking back button goes back. Using compose navigation. Unfortunately, I can't share the big project where the leak is big, because it is private. I can add you these logs and create it in the sample to validate based on the lifecycle + you could add leakcanary and see the difference between this (will depend on the app data size, because it leaks it all) and the small google internal leak. (it would be called when we get back to the screen and everything would be cleared, but onDispose removes the listener when moving to screen B)
|
@arriolac does this help or would you want me to extend the sample project to show this problem? |
@polivmi1 yes, that would be helpful. |
@arriolac I have added a sample here https://github.com/polivmi1/android-maps-compose
I am also attaching screenshots of the step 5 and 6: Please let me know if you need more information. It should be clear from this, but you can also add the lifecycle logs and try with the fix I mentioned in the first comment. Thanks for looking into it! |
@arriolac is this in your queue or is there anything else I could add to help with it? |
@polivmi1 you've been really helpful with the amount of information you've shared already. This is in my queue to look into. |
I can confirm the memory leak and your proposed workaround does indeed fix the issue, however, I think the underlying lifecycle for the NavBackStackEntry should be receiving the ON_DESTROY event. Will raise this to the navigation compose team to see where the fix should be applied. |
@arriolac is there an issuetracker discussion or a github issue with the navigation compose team that I could follow? |
@polivmi1 supposedly adding a custom animation within a NavHost is not supported. Can you try removing the wrapping |
@arriolac what AnimatedVisibility do you mean? I don't use anything that would wrap it on that screen. I use AnimatedVisibility only for some elements on some other screens to animate a button for example. What I use for screen animation is https://google.github.io/accompanist/navigation-animation/ - AnimatedNavHost - is that the problem? |
Ok I've confirmed that it is the intended behavior that the previous destination is not getting the DESTROYED event when navigating away from it. Your proposed workaround #138 (comment) should be put in place to resolve this @polivmi1. Would you like to make this contribution to the library? |
🎉 This issue has been resolved in version 2.7.1 🎉 The release is available on:
Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
🎉 This issue has been resolved in version 2.7.2 🎉 The release is available on:
Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
* LazyColumn 안에서 스크롤 해서 NaverMap이 안 보이는 시점에 메모리 해제가 되지 않아 메모리릭이 발생하는 현상, AnimatedNavHost 안에서 NaverMap을 사용할 때 onDestroy()가 호출되지 않는 현상을 해결하기 위해 코드를 수정합니다. * Update naver-map-compose/src/main/java/com/naver/maps/map/compose/NaverMap.kt Co-authored-by: Sungyong An <soupyong@gmail.com> * googlemaps/android-maps-compose#138 과 비슷하게 코드를 수정합니다. Co-authored-by: Sungyong An <soupyong@gmail.com>
I have mentioned this in #26 , but it is already closed, so I am opening a new issue.
I am getting a leak if the map component is cleared and then the activity is destroyed.
Previously when implementing it through AndroidView, to get rid of the maps leak, I had to use:
And
The reason is that Lifecycle.Event.ON_DESTROY might not be called, and this way you would always dispose of the map view in onDispose, which will always be called.
Would you be able to add this? I did fork and update it and the big memory leak disappeared.
`1 APPLICATION LEAKS
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: