Make various classes catch Exception
instead of RuntimeException
even when only RuntimeException
is theoretically possible.
#6859
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Make various classes catch
Exception
instead ofRuntimeException
even when onlyRuntimeException
is theoretically possible.In fact, because checked exceptions are a Java-source-language feature (rather than a JVM feature), it's possible to throw them when you're not "supposed to," either through tricky Java code or more naturally through other languages, such as Kotlin.
We have seen this happening a few times in tests. This causes exceptions to slip past the
catch
blocks that are meant to handle them. This could cause operations to hang, such as when one listener of aListenableFuture
throws an exception, preventing subsequent listeners (such as a listener that powersFutures.transform
) from running.I didn't cover every
catch (RuntimeException ...)
block in our codebase, but I tried to get the ones that looked most likely to be affected.RELNOTES=Changed various classes to catch
Exception
instead ofRuntimeException
even when onlyRuntimeException
is theoretically possible.