Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Simplify JsonReader #2221

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

Simplify JsonReader #2221

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

ThirdGoddess
Copy link

I think it can be modified here. What's your opinion?

I think it can be modified here. What's your opinion?
@ThirdGoddess ThirdGoddess changed the title Update JsonReader.java I think it can be modified here. What's your opinion? Oct 12, 2022
Copy link
Collaborator

@Marcono1234 Marcono1234 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, but please edit the title of your pull request to be more meaningful, for example: "Simplify JsonReader.peekNumber()"
(or similar)

@ThirdGoddess ThirdGoddess changed the title I think it can be modified here. What's your opinion? Simplify JsonReader Oct 13, 2022
@ThirdGoddess ThirdGoddess requested review from eamonnmcmanus and Marcono1234 and removed request for eamonnmcmanus and Marcono1234 October 25, 2022 16:50
@Marcono1234
Copy link
Collaborator

@ThirdGoddess, do you want to include the changes we mentioned in the review thread above?

@Marcono1234 Marcono1234 mentioned this pull request Dec 11, 2022
@Marcono1234
Copy link
Collaborator

This change was implemented now by #2282, therefore I am going to close your pull request. Thank you nontheless for your work on this!

(Though I guess the condition in JsonReader could still be simplified as mentioned in #2221 (comment), in case someone wants to do that.)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants