Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve UseCorrectAssertInTests handling for primitive equality comparisons #3833

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

copybara-service[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

Improve UseCorrectAssertInTests handling for primitive equality comparisons

Recommended via[]

assert a == 1; // usage to fix
assertThat(a).isSameInstanceAs(1); // old transform
assertThat(a).isEqualTo(1); // new behavior

Performed a blaze_error_prone run on a sample directory to validate my own CUJ: unknown commit.

I also started going down other related cleanups to tackle some other primitive comparison cases like "assert a == false" (to use isFalse) or "assert a > 0" (to use isGreaterThan), but there are so few usages that I don't think it's worth polishing and complicating this logic for such edge cases.

…risons

Recommended via[]

assert a == 1; // usage to fix
assertThat(a).isSameInstanceAs(1); // old transform
assertThat(a).isEqualTo(1); // new behavior

Performed a blaze_error_prone run on a sample directory to validate my own CUJ: unknown commit.

I also started going down other related cleanups to tackle some other primitive comparison cases like "assert a == false" (to use isFalse) or "assert a > 0" (to use isGreaterThan), but there are so few usages that I don't think it's worth polishing and complicating this logic for such edge cases.

PiperOrigin-RevId: 518647425
@copybara-service copybara-service bot closed this Mar 23, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant