skip experimental tag by default for user defined rules

checkers/ruleguard_checker.go

@@ -159,6 +159,10 @@ func newRuleguardChecker(info *linter.CheckerInfo, ctx *linter.CheckerContext) (
 			enabledGroups[g] = true
 		}
 	}
+
+	if !enabledTags["experimental"] {
+		disabledTags["experimental"] = true
+	}
 	ruleguardDebug := os.Getenv("GOCRITIC_RULEGUARD_DEBUG") != ""
 
 	inEnabledTags := func(g *ruleguard.GoRuleGroup) bool {

checkers/testdata/_integration/ruleguard/f1.go

@@ -1,12 +1,16 @@
 package foo
 
-import "fmt"
+import (
+	"fmt"
+	"regexp"
+)
 
 type myError error
 
 func _() {
 	var s1, s2 string
-	var _ = fmt.Sprintf("%s%s", s1, s2)
+	r, _ := regexp.MatchString(`^\s`, fmt.Sprintf("%s%s", s1, s2))
+	println(r)
 }
 
 func _() {

checkers/testdata/_integration/ruleguard/linttest.golden

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
 exit status 1
-./f1.go:5:1: ruleguard: error as an underlying type is probably a mistake
-./f1.go:9:10: ruleguard: suggestion: s1+s2
-./f1.go:25:6: ruleguard: use errors.New(k()) or fmt.Errorf("%s", k()) instead
+./f1.go:8:1: ruleguard: error as an underlying type is probably a mistake
+./f1.go:12:36: ruleguard: suggestion: s1+s2
+./f1.go:29:6: ruleguard: use errors.New(k()) or fmt.Errorf("%s", k()) instead

checkers/testdata/_integration/ruleguard/linttest.golden2

@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
 exit status 1
-./f1.go:25:6: ruleguard: use errors.New(k()) or fmt.Errorf("%s", k()) instead
+./f1.go:29:6: ruleguard: use errors.New(k()) or fmt.Errorf("%s", k()) instead

checkers/testdata/_integration/ruleguard/linttest.golden3

@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
 exit status 1
-./f1.go:14:2: ruleguard: may be simplified to one if
-./f1.go:25:6: ruleguard: use errors.New(k()) or fmt.Errorf("%s", k()) instead
+./f1.go:18:2: ruleguard: may be simplified to one if
+./f1.go:12:10: ruleguard: regexp compilation should be avoided on the hot paths
+./f1.go:29:6: ruleguard: use errors.New(k()) or fmt.Errorf("%s", k()) instead

checkers/testdata/_integration/ruleguard/linttest.golden4

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+exit status 1
+./f1.go:8:1: ruleguard: error as an underlying type is probably a mistake
+./f1.go:18:2: ruleguard: may be simplified to one if
+./f1.go:12:36: ruleguard: suggestion: s1+s2
+./f1.go:29:6: ruleguard: use errors.New(k()) or fmt.Errorf("%s", k()) instead

checkers/testdata/_integration/ruleguard/linttest.params

@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
 check -@ruleguard.rules ./rules.go -enable ruleguard -@ruleguard.disable=#test ./... | linttest.golden
 check -@ruleguard.rules ./rules.go -enable ruleguard -@ruleguard.enable=#style -@ruleguard.disable=#test ./... | linttest.golden2
-check -@ruleguard.rules ./rules.go -enable ruleguard -@ruleguard.enable=#style,#test ./... | linttest.golden3
+check -@ruleguard.rules ./rules.go -enable ruleguard -@ruleguard.enable=#style,#test,#experimental ./... | linttest.golden3
+check -@ruleguard.rules ./rules.go -enable ruleguard ./... | linttest.golden4

checkers/testdata/_integration/ruleguard/rules.go

@@ -29,3 +29,11 @@ func dynamicFmtString(m dsl.Matcher) {
 		Suggest("errors.New($f($args))").
 		Report(`use errors.New($f($args)) or fmt.Errorf("%s", $f($args)) instead`)
 }
+
+//doc:tags experimental
+func regexpCompile(m dsl.Matcher) {
+	m.Match(`regexp.Match($*_)`,
+		`regexp.MatchString($*_)`,
+		`regexp.MatchReader($*_)`,
+	).Report(`regexp compilation should be avoided on the hot paths`)
+}