Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merge releases/v2 into releases/v1 #1248

Merged
merged 64 commits into from Sep 16, 2022
Merged

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot commented Sep 15, 2022

Merging 6a38b7d into releases/v1

Conductor for this PR is @henrymercer

Contains the following pull requests:

Please review the following:

  • The CHANGELOG displays the correct version and date.
  • The CHANGELOG includes all relevant, user-facing changes since the last release.
  • There are no unexpected commits being merged into the releases/v1 branch.
  • The docs team is aware of any documentation changes that need to be released.

aeisenberg and others added 30 commits August 30, 2022 10:00
This change adds:

- new `registries` block allowed in code scanning config file
- new `registries-auth-tokens` input in init action
- Change the downloadPacks function so that it accepts new parameters:
    - registries block
    - api auth
- Generate a qlconfig.yml file with the registries block if one is
  supplied. Use this file when downloading packs.
- temporarily set the `GITHUB_TOKEN` and `CODEQL_REGISTRIES_AUTH` based
  on api auth

TODO:

1. integration test
2. handle pack downloads when the config is generated by the CLI
This will enable us to test this behavior in PR checks.
Also simplify and add some more detailed documentation.
Co-authored-by: Andrew Eisenberg <aeisenberg@github.com>
`in` checks the indices of an array, not the values.
Mergeback v2.1.22 refs/heads/releases/v2 into main
Previously the test depended on `createdDBForScannedLanguages` making no
async calls prior to `codeql resolve extractor`.
Now the test is fixed, we can simplify by introducing an async call.
We now trace in init when using reconciled tracing, so we no longer need
to set the `CODEQL_EXTRACTOR_GO_BUILD_TRACING` environment variable.
A bug preventing us from using Lua tracing for Go on Windows is fixed
in CLI 2.10.4+, so we
can now resume using Lua tracing for Go on Windows when using these
CLI versions.
…-go-windows

Run Lua tracing for Go on Windows in CLI 2.10.4+
Autobuild Go in `analyze` if not already built
The [release notes](https://github.com/avajs/ava/releases/tag/v4.3.3)
mention compatibility with Node 18.8.
aeisenberg and others added 19 commits September 7, 2022 14:38
Avoids a bug in 2.10.4. Also, add some better handling for invalid
registries blocks.
Add support for downloading packs from GHES
Always defer to the CLI on the Lua tracer state from now on.
This test is broken, as it first sets environment variables, and then
immediately unsets it again.
This only worked by chance with the legacy tracer, and breaks the Lua
tracer.
Remove the lua tracer feature flag check from the codeql-action.
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Update dependencies Trigger PR workflow to update dependencies label Sep 15, 2022
@henrymercer henrymercer added Update dependencies Trigger PR workflow to update dependencies and removed Update dependencies Trigger PR workflow to update dependencies labels Sep 15, 2022
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the Update dependencies Trigger PR workflow to update dependencies label Sep 15, 2022
@henrymercer henrymercer marked this pull request as ready for review September 15, 2022 09:19
@henrymercer henrymercer requested a review from a team as a code owner September 15, 2022 09:19
@henrymercer henrymercer merged commit fe2e30b into releases/v1 Sep 16, 2022
@henrymercer henrymercer deleted the update-v1.1.23-6a38b7d4 branch September 16, 2022 09:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants