Fix 4 vulnerable dependencies identified by Prisma Cloud #2
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
![bridgecrew[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/52968?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| @@ -46,12 +46,12 @@ | |||
| <dependency> | |||
| <groupId>mysql</groupId> | |||
| <artifactId>mysql-connector-java</artifactId> | |||
| <version>8.0.16</version> | |||
| <version>8.0.28</version> | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
mysql:mysql-connector-java 8.0.28 / pom.xml
This package use a non-SPDX, unrecognized, or private open-source license. Ensure this package is compliant.
ghouldaemon
force-pushed
the
pcc-vulnerability-fixes
branch
2 times, most recently
from
ad21562
to
e6b1d27
Compare
| @@ -46,12 +46,12 @@ | |||
| <dependency> | |||
| <groupId>mysql</groupId> | |||
| <artifactId>mysql-connector-java</artifactId> | |||
| <version>8.0.16</version> | |||
| <version>8.0.28</version> | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
mysql:mysql-connector-java 8.0.28 / pom.xml
This package use a non-SPDX, unrecognized, or private open-source license. Ensure this package is compliant.
ghouldaemon
force-pushed
the
pcc-vulnerability-fixes
branch
from
24a02f0
to
e6b1d27
Compare
ghouldaemon
force-pushed
the
pcc-vulnerability-fixes
branch
from
9855945
to
e6b1d27
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Prisma Cloud has detected new vulnerabilities or dependencies in the scan performed on Mon, 11 Dec 2023 11:58:15 UTC
This PR includes the fixes for the vulnerabilities discovered below:
@babel/traverseprior to versions 7.23.2 and 8.0.0-alpha.4 and all versions ofbabel-traverse, using Babel to compile code that was specifically crafted by an attacker can lead to arbitrary code execution during compilation, when using plugins that rely on thepath.evaluate()orpath.evaluateTruthy()internal Babel methods. Known affected plugins are@babel/plugin-transform-runtime;@babel/preset-envwhen using itsuseBuiltInsoption; and any "polyfill provider" plugin that depends on@babel/helper-define-polyfill-provider, such asbabel-plugin-polyfill-corejs3,babel-plugin-polyfill-corejs2,babel-plugin-polyfill-es-shims,babel-plugin-polyfill-regenerator. No other plugins under the@babel/namespace are impacted, but third-party plugins might be. Users that only compile trusted code are not impacted. The vulnerability has been fixed in@babel/traverse@7.23.2and@babel/traverse@8.0.0-alpha.4. Those who cannot upgrade@babel/traverseand are using one of the affected packages mentioned above should upgrade them to their latest version to avoid triggering the vulnerable code path in affected@babel/traverseversions:@babel/plugin-transform-runtimev7.23.2,@babel/preset-envv7.23.2,@babel/helper-define-polyfill-providerv0.4.3,babel-plugin-polyfill-corejs2v0.4.6, `babel-plugin-polyfill-c@babel/traverseprior to versions 7.23.2 and 8.0.0-alpha.4 and all versions ofbabel-traverse, using Babel to compile code that was specifically crafted by an attacker can lead to arbitrary code execution during compilation, when using plugins that rely on thepath.evaluate()orpath.evaluateTruthy()internal Babel methods. Known affected plugins are@babel/plugin-transform-runtime;@babel/preset-envwhen using itsuseBuiltInsoption; and any "polyfill provider" plugin that depends on@babel/helper-define-polyfill-provider, such asbabel-plugin-polyfill-corejs3,babel-plugin-polyfill-corejs2,babel-plugin-polyfill-es-shims,babel-plugin-polyfill-regenerator. No other plugins under the@babel/namespace are impacted, but third-party plugins might be. Users that only compile trusted code are not impacted. The vulnerability has been fixed in@babel/traverse@7.23.2and@babel/traverse@8.0.0-alpha.4. Those who cannot upgrade@babel/traverseand are using one of the affected packages mentioned above should upgrade them to their latest version to avoid triggering the vulnerable code path in affected@babel/traverseversions:@babel/plugin-transform-runtimev7.23.2,@babel/preset-envv7.23.2,@babel/helper-define-polyfill-providerv0.4.3,babel-plugin-polyfill-corejs2v0.4.6, `babel-plugin-polyfill-c@babel/traverseprior to versions 7.23.2 and 8.0.0-alpha.4 and all versions ofbabel-traverse, using Babel to compile code that was specifically crafted by an attacker can lead to arbitrary code execution during compilation, when using plugins that rely on thepath.evaluate()orpath.evaluateTruthy()internal Babel methods. Known affected plugins are@babel/plugin-transform-runtime;@babel/preset-envwhen using itsuseBuiltInsoption; and any "polyfill provider" plugin that depends on@babel/helper-define-polyfill-provider, such asbabel-plugin-polyfill-corejs3,babel-plugin-polyfill-corejs2,babel-plugin-polyfill-es-shims,babel-plugin-polyfill-regenerator. No other plugins under the@babel/namespace are impacted, but third-party plugins might be. Users that only compile trusted code are not impacted. The vulnerability has been fixed in@babel/traverse@7.23.2and@babel/traverse@8.0.0-alpha.4. Those who cannot upgrade@babel/traverseand are using one of the affected packages mentioned above should upgrade them to their latest version to avoid triggering the vulnerable code path in affected@babel/traverseversions:@babel/plugin-transform-runtimev7.23.2,@babel/preset-envv7.23.2,@babel/helper-define-polyfill-providerv0.4.3,babel-plugin-polyfill-corejs2v0.4.6, `babel-plugin-polyfill-c@babel/traverseprior to versions 7.23.2 and 8.0.0-alpha.4 and all versions ofbabel-traverse, using Babel to compile code that was specifically crafted by an attacker can lead to arbitrary code execution during compilation, when using plugins that rely on thepath.evaluate()orpath.evaluateTruthy()internal Babel methods. Known affected plugins are@babel/plugin-transform-runtime;@babel/preset-envwhen using itsuseBuiltInsoption; and any "polyfill provider" plugin that depends on@babel/helper-define-polyfill-provider, such asbabel-plugin-polyfill-corejs3,babel-plugin-polyfill-corejs2,babel-plugin-polyfill-es-shims,babel-plugin-polyfill-regenerator. No other plugins under the@babel/namespace are impacted, but third-party plugins might be. Users that only compile trusted code are not impacted. The vulnerability has been fixed in@babel/traverse@7.23.2and@babel/traverse@8.0.0-alpha.4. Those who cannot upgrade@babel/traverseand are using one of the affected packages mentioned above should upgrade them to their latest version to avoid triggering the vulnerable code path in affected@babel/traverseversions:@babel/plugin-transform-runtimev7.23.2,@babel/preset-envv7.23.2,@babel/helper-define-polyfill-providerv0.4.3,babel-plugin-polyfill-corejs2v0.4.6, `babel-plugin-polyfill-c@babel/traverseprior to versions 7.23.2 and 8.0.0-alpha.4 and all versions ofbabel-traverse, using Babel to compile code that was specifically crafted by an attacker can lead to arbitrary code execution during compilation, when using plugins that rely on thepath.evaluate()orpath.evaluateTruthy()internal Babel methods. Known affected plugins are@babel/plugin-transform-runtime;@babel/preset-envwhen using itsuseBuiltInsoption; and any "polyfill provider" plugin that depends on@babel/helper-define-polyfill-provider, such asbabel-plugin-polyfill-corejs3,babel-plugin-polyfill-corejs2,babel-plugin-polyfill-es-shims,babel-plugin-polyfill-regenerator. No other plugins under the@babel/namespace are impacted, but third-party plugins might be. Users that only compile trusted code are not impacted. The vulnerability has been fixed in@babel/traverse@7.23.2and@babel/traverse@8.0.0-alpha.4. Those who cannot upgrade@babel/traverseand are using one of the affected packages mentioned above should upgrade them to their latest version to avoid triggering the vulnerable code path in affected@babel/traverseversions:@babel/plugin-transform-runtimev7.23.2,@babel/preset-envv7.23.2,@babel/helper-define-polyfill-providerv0.4.3,babel-plugin-polyfill-corejs2v0.4.6, `babel-plugin-polyfill-c@babel/traverseprior to versions 7.23.2 and 8.0.0-alpha.4 and all versions ofbabel-traverse, using Babel to compile code that was specifically crafted by an attacker can lead to arbitrary code execution during compilation, when using plugins that rely on thepath.evaluate()orpath.evaluateTruthy()internal Babel methods. Known affected plugins are@babel/plugin-transform-runtime;@babel/preset-envwhen using itsuseBuiltInsoption; and any "polyfill provider" plugin that depends on@babel/helper-define-polyfill-provider, such asbabel-plugin-polyfill-corejs3,babel-plugin-polyfill-corejs2,babel-plugin-polyfill-es-shims,babel-plugin-polyfill-regenerator. No other plugins under the@babel/namespace are impacted, but third-party plugins might be. Users that only compile trusted code are not impacted. The vulnerability has been fixed in@babel/traverse@7.23.2and@babel/traverse@8.0.0-alpha.4. Those who cannot upgrade@babel/traverseand are using one of the affected packages mentioned above should upgrade them to their latest version to avoid triggering the vulnerable code path in affected@babel/traverseversions:@babel/plugin-transform-runtimev7.23.2,@babel/preset-envv7.23.2,@babel/helper-define-polyfill-providerv0.4.3,babel-plugin-polyfill-corejs2v0.4.6, `babel-plugin-polyfill-cSet-Cookieheaders, it may send one client'ssessioncookie to other clients. The severity depends on the application's use of the session and the proxy's behavior regarding cookies. The risk depends on all these conditions being met. 1. The application must be hosted behind a caching proxy that does not strip cookies or ignore responses with cookies. 2. The application setssession.permanent = True3. The application does not access or modify the session at any point during a request. 4.SESSION_REFRESH_EACH_REQUESTenabled (the default). 5. The application does not set aCache-Controlheader to indicate that a page is private or should not be cached. This happens because vulnerable versions of Flask only set theVary: Cookieheader when the session is accessed or modified, not when it is refreshed (re-sent to update the expiration) without being accessed or modified. This issue has been fixed in versions 2.3.2 and 2.2.5.parsemethod of the JSON5 library before and including versions 1.0.1 and 2.2.1 does not restrict parsing of keys named__proto__, allowing specially crafted strings to pollute the prototype of the resulting object. This vulnerability pollutes the prototype of the object returned byJSON5.parseand not the global Object prototype, which is the commonly understood definition of Prototype Pollution. However, polluting the prototype of a single object can have significant security impact for an application if the object is later used in trusted operations. This vulnerability could allow an attacker to set arbitrary and unexpected keys on the object returned fromJSON5.parse. The actual impact will depend on how applications utilize the returned object and how they filter unwanted keys, but could include denial of service, cross-site scripting, elevation of privilege, and in extreme cases, remote code execution.JSON5.parseshould restrict parsing of__proto__keys when parsing JSON strings to objects. As a point of reference, theJSON.parsemethod included in JavaScript ignores__proto__keys. Simply changingJSON5.parsetoJSON.parsein the examples above mitigates this vulnerability. This vulnerability is patched in json5 verparsemethod of the JSON5 library before and including versions 1.0.1 and 2.2.1 does not restrict parsing of keys named__proto__, allowing specially crafted strings to pollute the prototype of the resulting object. This vulnerability pollutes the prototype of the object returned byJSON5.parseand not the global Object prototype, which is the commonly understood definition of Prototype Pollution. However, polluting the prototype of a single object can have significant security impact for an application if the object is later used in trusted operations. This vulnerability could allow an attacker to set arbitrary and unexpected keys on the object returned fromJSON5.parse. The actual impact will depend on how applications utilize the returned object and how they filter unwanted keys, but could include denial of service, cross-site scripting, elevation of privilege, and in extreme cases, remote code execution.JSON5.parseshould restrict parsing of__proto__keys when parsing JSON strings to objects. As a point of reference, theJSON.parsemethod included in JavaScript ignores__proto__keys. Simply changingJSON5.parsetoJSON.parsein the examples above mitigates this vulnerability. This vulnerability is patched in json5 verparsemethod of the JSON5 library before and including versions 1.0.1 and 2.2.1 does not restrict parsing of keys named__proto__, allowing specially crafted strings to pollute the prototype of the resulting object. This vulnerability pollutes the prototype of the object returned byJSON5.parseand not the global Object prototype, which is the commonly understood definition of Prototype Pollution. However, polluting the prototype of a single object can have significant security impact for an application if the object is later used in trusted operations. This vulnerability could allow an attacker to set arbitrary and unexpected keys on the object returned fromJSON5.parse. The actual impact will depend on how applications utilize the returned object and how they filter unwanted keys, but could include denial of service, cross-site scripting, elevation of privilege, and in extreme cases, remote code execution.JSON5.parseshould restrict parsing of__proto__keys when parsing JSON strings to objects. As a point of reference, theJSON.parsemethod included in JavaScript ignores__proto__keys. Simply changingJSON5.parsetoJSON.parsein the examples above mitigates this vulnerability. This vulnerability is patched in json5 verf934b228bwhich has been included in releases from 2.0.1. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.parsemethod of the JSON5 library before and including versions 1.0.1 and 2.2.1 does not restrict parsing of keys named__proto__, allowing specially crafted strings to pollute the prototype of the resulting object. This vulnerability pollutes the prototype of the object returned byJSON5.parseand not the global Object prototype, which is the commonly understood definition of Prototype Pollution. However, polluting the prototype of a single object can have significant security impact for an application if the object is later used in trusted operations. This vulnerability could allow an attacker to set arbitrary and unexpected keys on the object returned fromJSON5.parse. The actual impact will depend on how applications utilize the returned object and how they filter unwanted keys, but could include denial of service, cross-site scripting, elevation of privilege, and in extreme cases, remote code execution.JSON5.parseshould restrict parsing of__proto__keys when parsing JSON strings to objects. As a point of reference, theJSON.parsemethod included in JavaScript ignores__proto__keys. Simply changingJSON5.parsetoJSON.parsein the examples above mitigates this vulnerability. This vulnerability is patched in json5 verparsemethod of the JSON5 library before and including versions 1.0.1 and 2.2.1 does not restrict parsing of keys named__proto__, allowing specially crafted strings to pollute the prototype of the resulting object. This vulnerability pollutes the prototype of the object returned byJSON5.parseand not the global Object prototype, which is the commonly understood definition of Prototype Pollution. However, polluting the prototype of a single object can have significant security impact for an application if the object is later used in trusted operations. This vulnerability could allow an attacker to set arbitrary and unexpected keys on the object returned fromJSON5.parse. The actual impact will depend on how applications utilize the returned object and how they filter unwanted keys, but could include denial of service, cross-site scripting, elevation of privilege, and in extreme cases, remote code execution.JSON5.parseshould restrict parsing of__proto__keys when parsing JSON strings to objects. As a point of reference, theJSON.parsemethod included in JavaScript ignores__proto__keys. Simply changingJSON5.parsetoJSON.parsein the examples above mitigates this vulnerability. This vulnerability is patched in json5 verparsemethod of the JSON5 library before and including versions 1.0.1 and 2.2.1 does not restrict parsing of keys named__proto__, allowing specially crafted strings to pollute the prototype of the resulting object. This vulnerability pollutes the prototype of the object returned byJSON5.parseand not the global Object prototype, which is the commonly understood definition of Prototype Pollution. However, polluting the prototype of a single object can have significant security impact for an application if the object is later used in trusted operations. This vulnerability could allow an attacker to set arbitrary and unexpected keys on the object returned fromJSON5.parse. The actual impact will depend on how applications utilize the returned object and how they filter unwanted keys, but could include denial of service, cross-site scripting, elevation of privilege, and in extreme cases, remote code execution.JSON5.parseshould restrict parsing of__proto__keys when parsing JSON strings to objects. As a point of reference, theJSON.parsemethod included in JavaScript ignores__proto__keys. Simply changingJSON5.parsetoJSON.parsein the examples above mitigates this vulnerability. This vulnerability is patched in json5 versocket.ioparent package. Older versions are not impacted. A specially crafted HTTP request can trigger an uncaught exception on the Engine.IO server, thus killing the Node.js process. This impacts all the users of theengine.iopackage, including those who use depending packages likesocket.io. This issue was fixed in version 6.4.2 of Engine.IO. There is no known workaround except upgrading to a safe version.