Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump rspec-rails from 3.9.1 to 4.1.0 #88

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

dependabot[bot]
Copy link

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Mar 8, 2021

Bumps rspec-rails from 3.9.1 to 4.1.0.

Release notes

Sourced from rspec-rails's releases.

4.0.2 / 2020-12-26

Full Changelog

Bug Fixes:

  • Indent all extra failure lines output from system specs. (Alex Robbin, #2321)
  • Generated request spec for update now uses the correct let. (Paul Hanyzewski, #2344)
  • Return true/false from predicate methods in config rather than raw values. (Phil Pirozhkov, Jon Rowe, #2353, #2354)
  • Remove old #fixture_path feature detection code which broke under newer Rails. (Koen Punt, Jon Rowe, #2370)
Changelog

Sourced from rspec-rails's changelog.

4.1.0 / 2021-03-06

Enhancements:

  • Issue a warning when using job matchers with #at mis-match on usec precision. (Jon Rowe, #2350)
  • Generated request specs now have a bare _spec suffix instead of request_spec. (Eloy Espinaco, Luka Lüdicke, #2355, #2356, #2378)
  • Generated scaffold now includes engine route helpers when inside a mountable engine. (Andrew W. Lee, #2372)
  • Improve request spec "controller" scafold when no action is specified. (Thomas Hareau, #2399)
  • Introduce testing snippets concept (Phil Pirozhkov, Benoit Tigeot, #2423)
  • Prevent collisions with let(:name) for Rails 6.1 and let(:method_name) on older Rails. (Benoit Tigeot, #2461)

4.0.2 / 2020-12-26

Full Changelog

Bug Fixes:

  • Indent all extra failure lines output from system specs. (Alex Robbin, #2321)
  • Generated request spec for update now uses the correct let. (Paul Hanyzewski, #2344)
  • Return true/false from predicate methods in config rather than raw values. (Phil Pirozhkov, Jon Rowe, #2353, #2354)
  • Remove old #fixture_path feature detection code which broke under newer Rails. (Koen Punt, Jon Rowe, #2370)
  • Fix an error when use_active_record is false (Phil Pirozhkov, #2423)

4.0.1 / 2020-05-16

Full Changelog

Bug Fixes:

  • Remove warning when calling driven_by in system specs. (Aubin Lorieux, #2302)
  • Fix comparison of times for #at in job matchers. (Jon Rowe, Markus Doits, #2304)
  • Allow have_enqueued_mail to match when a sub class of ActionMailer::DeliveryJob is set using <Class>.delivery_job=. (Atsushi Yoshida #2305)
  • Restore Ruby 2.2.x compatibility. (Jon Rowe, #2332)
  • Add required_ruby_version to gem spec. (Marc-André Lafortune, #2319, #2338)

4.0.0 / 2020-03-24

Full Changelog

Enhancements:

  • Adds support for Rails 6. (Penelope Phippen, Benoit Tigeot, Jon Rowe, #2071)
  • Adds support for JRuby on Rails 5.2 and 6
  • Add support for parameterised mailers (Ignatius Reza, #2125)
  • Add ActionMailbox spec helpers and test type (James Dabbs, #2119)

... (truncated)

Commits
  • 18ab7d3 Update readme for 4.1.0
  • 3447608 v4.1.0
  • 6ebbfb7 v4.0.2
  • ee251b7 Merge pull request #2471 from hxrxchang/add-link-to-4-0-maintenance
  • 67682f5 fix(README): made a link to 4-0-maintenance branch
  • 8803ce4 Merge pull request #2470 from rspec/update-to-mainline-ammeter-to-support-rsp...
  • 22bec57 Update ammeter to support RSpec 4
  • 7cf3da1 Merge pull request #2469 from rspec/workaround-ammeter-multi-condition-filtering
  • 0d92b82 Work around ammeter' incompatibility with RSpec 4
  • 324e98e Merge pull request #2467 from rspec/let-name-collision
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

Bumps [rspec-rails](https://github.com/rspec/rspec-rails) from 3.9.1 to 4.1.0.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/rspec/rspec-rails/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/rspec/rspec-rails/blob/main/Changelog.md)
- [Commits](rspec/rspec-rails@v3.9.1...v4.1.0)

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Mar 8, 2021

The following labels could not be found: dependencies, ruby, automerge.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Mar 10, 2021

Superseded by #90.

@dependabot dependabot bot closed this Mar 10, 2021
@dependabot dependabot bot deleted the dependabot/bundler/rspec-rails-4.1.0 branch March 10, 2021 00:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

0 participants