Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

'Fix' the Sierra build error by adding -tags legacy #2594

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 31, 2021

Conversation

andydotxyz
Copy link
Member

Description:

Cannot find a way to make this work automatically - we need to update cgo LDFLAGS based on OS version which seems to not be supported.
So add legacy tag that turns off the new notification center usage.

Fixes #2478

Checklist:

  • Tests included. <- compile failure on old devices, but we don't have stuff that out-dated in CI
  • Lint and formatter run with no errors.
  • Tests all pass.

@Jacalz
Copy link
Member

Jacalz commented Oct 28, 2021

Will an app built with -tags legacy still run on a newer Mac?

@andydotxyz
Copy link
Member Author

Will an app built with -tags legacy still run on a newer Mac?

yes it will

Copy link
Member

@changkun changkun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just one minor build tag change looks like a great solution around the LDFLAGS issue. I wonder introduce a legacy tag is fix the problem specifically is indeed a workaround, is there any chance to make the build tag more general? Do we have a document about the build tag convention?

Comment on lines +1 to +2
// +build !ci
// +build !legacy
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
// +build !ci
// +build !legacy
//go:build !ci && !legacy
// +build !ci,!legacy

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, this is built on the release branch - that has not migrated to Go 1.17 build flag convention yet, that is only on develop

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't know how the tag can be more general than legacy. I commented above how I think this can apply.
After release I will add it to https://developer.fyne.io/started/compiling

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is the code dedicated in the current release branch and will never be contained in future releases? If we have everything in the develop compatible with go:build whereas this newly introduced one is not, then when the develop branch is merged into the release branch, we will have missed cases such as this one.

Having an additional go:build should be no problem at all since they are useless for those older compilers. If 1.18 is released, then users who use the newest compiler will not be able to use the current release as a module because their compiler cannot recognize the build tags. So in any case, we will have to adapt the go:build tag for every supported release.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is the code dedicated in the current release branch and will never be contained in future releases?

When the release branch does merge to develop this will be addressed - the linters will not allow it in without that code added :). However adding it to this PR and the branch would be in an inconsistent state.
I don't think we will still be working on v2.0.x bug fix releases when Go 1.18 is released. If we are then this branch can be updated.

@Jacalz
Copy link
Member

Jacalz commented Oct 29, 2021

We do have https://developer.fyne.io/started/compiling for docs.

@changkun
Copy link
Member

We do have https://developer.fyne.io/started/compiling for docs.

Thanks for the doc. Indeed I found that before, but it turns out the document is for users, not development purposes. For instance, the build tag ci, arm, arm64, etc. are not entirely documented. The supported combination is also not very clear.

@andydotxyz
Copy link
Member Author

arm, arm64, etc

These are part of the Go documentation on build tags. We do indeed have ci but are trying to phase it out.

@andydotxyz andydotxyz merged commit 729a478 into fyne-io:release/v2.1.x Oct 31, 2021
@andydotxyz andydotxyz deleted the fix/2478 branch October 31, 2021 12:18
@Jacalz Jacalz mentioned this pull request Jan 2, 2024
29 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants