Fix python311 compatibility #69
Conversation
|
You'll need "3.11-dev" until 3.11 is released, and currently installing |
Thanks! Do you mind giving trying to set up the CI? I think it would be good to make sure, we don't break anything else wrt Python 3.11. |
|
I'll set it up later tonight 馃憤 |
ap--
force-pushed
the
fix-python311-compatibility
branch
from
91813b9
to
470a433
Compare
|
I added tests for mkdir's exist_ok behavior, which required a few additional changes to the tests for cloud filesystems. Regarding the py3.11 tests: I will wait for aio-libs/aiohttp#6600 to provide sources that build under 3.11 which should hopefully be soon, now that rc1 is out. |
ap--
force-pushed
the
fix-python311-compatibility
branch
from
89b1271
to
bf1ea06
Compare
mkdir was the one method broken by moving away from _accessors in Python3.11
ap--
force-pushed
the
fix-python311-compatibility
branch
from
bf1ea06
to
a1dd8fd
Compare
ap--
force-pushed
the
fix-python311-compatibility
branch
from
a1dd8fd
to
4366b97
Compare
|
Hey everyone, This PR is now ready for review 馃憤 Cheers, |
| if create_parents: | ||
| return self._fs.makedirs(pth, **kwargs) | ||
| else: | ||
| if not kwargs.get("exist_ok", False) and self._fs.exists(pth): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
why not put exist_ok explicitly in the function signature ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm using the function signature defined in the base accessor cls previously defined in #59
I don't think it's worth cleaning this up a lot, since (1) it's a private interface and (2) all of this has to be refactored again once the remaining pathlib changes land in python=3.12.
Hello everyone,
this fixes all tests under Python 3.11. And it closes #67.
It basically only required to provide a working
mkdirmethod for the testsuite to pass.In Python 3.11's pathlib the
_accessorclasses have been removed and so UPath's implementation deviates now a little bit from the new pathlib implementation. It's not really problematic for now, if we explicitly disable all that is not working (I raiseNotImplementedErrorin many methods that now rely directly onos.pathfunctions). If needed, some of these disabled methods could probably be implemented in an fsspec compatible way.Once python/cpython#31691 and later python/cpython#31085 are merged into python, I believe this should be revisited.
Cheers,
Andreas 馃槂