Update x/sys to latest #379
Conversation
|
It looks that Go 1.11 support on darwin was dropped by https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/sys/+/250437 I think we should drop support for Go 1.11 because the release policy of Go https://tip.golang.org/doc/devel/release#policy says "Each major Go release is supported until there are two newer major releases". |
|
Shall I update this PR to include an update to the test matrix? Should 1.11 just be dropped entirely? Should any other releases be dropped at the same time? |
|
In my opinion, I recommend to create a pull request that drops Go 1.11. But, I'm a newbie in fsnotify org. |
Done. See #381 |
* introduce GitHub Actions * Add lint+vet+old versions to GitHub Action * Remove Travis CI and references * Drop support/testing for Go 1.11 and earlier (fsnotify#381) * Update x/sys to latest (fsnotify#379) * add //go:build lines + add 1.17.0-rc2 to test matrix (fsnotify#377) * Update test matrix for go 1.17 stable release (fsnotify#385) * Add AddRaw to not follow symlinks + Fix link folloing on Windows (fsnotify#289) * v1.5.0 preparation (fsnotify#380) * revise pull request template * Revert "Add AddRaw to not follow symlinks + Fix link folloing on Windows (fsnotify#289)" This reverts commit e2e9517. * prepare 1.5.1, retract 1.5.0 * Removed dead link * Update issue templates (fsnotify#410) * Update issue templates * remove old issue template * Test on Go 1.18 and two most recent versions (fsnotify#411) * Test on Go 1.18 and two most recent versions * on push * ci * update readme * revise contributing * maintainers wanted * Final Notice: Maintainers Wanted * fix go vet warnings: call to (*T).Fatalf from a non-test goroutine (fsnotify#416) * made the changes related to recursive directory check * made changes in window.go for buffer size * DA-992: Pair windows' delete + create event to generate a rename event (#1) * made the changes related to recursive directory check * made changes in window.go for buffer size * added the oldname attribute * old name added to rename event, one event is generated for rename * added oldname in printing rename events * tests for checking the oldName attr for rename added * create fsnotify event added * input to create event changed * create fsnotify event function modified * ID added * logs added * added create fsnotify event in inotify * logs added * prints added * reviews * reviews addressed * Hangkun/da 992/window rename event (#2) * Let's begin * Add getpath * Init test workflow * 1.40.0 exits? * Linter fix * asdf * 100 Co-authored-by: hu13 <hangkun@preveil.com> * Clean up unused * Badge Co-authored-by: Hangkun Ung <hangkun.ung@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: hu13 <hangkun@preveil.com> * Rebase upstream fixes * Rename bundle only works on windows * Update CI golang Co-authored-by: Ichinose Shogo <shogo82148@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Oliver Bristow <evilumbrella+github@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Nahum Shalman <nahamu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Nathan Youngman <4566+nathany@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Loïc Vernet <vernet.loic@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Nathan Youngman <git@nathany.com> Co-authored-by: paris <pariya.b@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: hu13 <hangkun@preveil.com>
What does this pull request do?
Upgrades x/sys to the latest revision as of today.
Where should the reviewer start?
This update appears to break test
(macos-latest, 1.11).#371 will require an update to x/sys and exhibits the same test failure.
This PR demonstrates that the breakage is from x/sys, not the content of #371.
I don't know if it's safe to drop support for 1.11, if this represents a bug somehow introduced into x/sys/unix, or something else.
How should this be manually tested?
The important test failure is automated with GitHub actions.