Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Correctly specify nullability of Subject for NumericAssertions #2473

Draft
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

vbreuss
Copy link
Contributor

@vbreuss vbreuss commented Nov 19, 2023

Discussion in #2472

IMPORTANT

  • If the PR touches the public API, the changes have been approved in a separate issue with the "api-approved" label.
  • The code complies with the Coding Guidelines for C#.
  • The changes are covered by unit tests which follow the Arrange-Act-Assert syntax and the naming conventions such as is used in these tests.
  • If the PR adds a feature or fixes a bug, please update the release notes with a functional description that explains what the change means to consumers of this library, which are published on the website.
  • If the PR changes the public API the changes needs to be included by running AcceptApiChanges.ps1 or AcceptApiChanges.sh.
  • If the PR affects the documentation, please include your changes in this pull request so the documentation will appear on the website.
    • Please also run ./build.sh --target spellcheck or .\build.ps1 --target spellcheck before pushing and check the good outcome

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 19, 2023

Qodana for .NET

387 new problems were found

Inspection name Severity Problems
Cannot resolve reference in XML comment 🔴 Failure 247
The annotation for nullable reference types should only be used in code within a '#nullable' annotations context. 🔴 Failure 66
Ambiguous reference in XML comment 🔴 Failure 4
Keyword 'new' is required 🔴 Failure 1
Redundant using directive 🔶 Warning 46
Usage of <inheritdoc /> is invalid 🔶 Warning 7
Method return value is never used (private accessibility) 🔶 Warning 7
Method with optional or 'params' parameter is hidden by overload 🔶 Warning 1
Unused parameter (private accessibility) 🔶 Warning 1
Inline temporary variable ◽️ Notice 7

💡 Qodana analysis was run in the pull request mode: only the changed files were checked

View the detailed Qodana report

To be able to view the detailed Qodana report, you can either:

  1. Register at Qodana Cloud and configure the action
  2. Use GitHub Code Scanning with Qodana
  3. Host Qodana report at GitHub Pages
  4. Inspect and use qodana.sarif.json (see the Qodana SARIF format for details)

To get *.log files or any other Qodana artifacts, run the action with upload-result option set to true,
so that the action will upload the files as the job artifacts:

      - name: 'Qodana Scan'
        uses: JetBrains/qodana-action@v2023.2.8
        with:
          upload-result: true
Contact Qodana team

Contact us at qodana-support@jetbrains.com

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Nov 19, 2023

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 7398628470

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage decreased (-0.01%) to 97.452%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 7378622478: -0.01%
Covered Lines: 11745
Relevant Lines: 11930

💛 - Coveralls

@vbreuss vbreuss force-pushed the topic/avoid-possible-invalidoperationexception branch from 1f74c0e to d0d6429 Compare January 3, 2024 14:38
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 3, 2024

Qodana for .NET

It seems all right 👌

No new problems were found according to the checks applied

💡 Qodana analysis was run in the pull request mode: only the changed files were checked
☁️ View the detailed Qodana report

Contact Qodana team

Contact us at qodana-support@jetbrains.com

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants