Revert "Add the ability to exclude non-browsable members from equivalency tests"

[jnyrup]

As there is an ongoing discussion in #1827 about the design of ExcludingNonBrowsableMembers, we have to revert #1807, to avoid blocking releasing a new version of Fluent Assertions, until we eventually get the design right.

cc: @logiclrd

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 1964941130

Warning: This coverage report may be inaccurate.

We've detected an issue with your CI configuration that might affect the accuracy of this pull request's coverage report.
To ensure accuracy in future PRs, please see these guidelines.
A quick fix for this PR: rebase it; your next report should be accurate.

• 8 of 8 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall coverage decreased (-0.009%) to 95.837%

---

Totals
Change from base Build 1941743704:	-0.009%
Covered Lines:	11366
Relevant Lines:	11721

---

💛 - Coveralls