Merge pull request #213 from FFY00/update-org-name

Update repository name

CHANGELOG.md

@@ -373,32 +373,32 @@ from crates.io in the future.
 
 <!-- Issues -->
 
-[Issue #6]: https://github.com/bitvecto-rs/bitvec/issues/6
-[Issue #17]: https://github.com/bitvecto-rs/bitvec/issues/17
-[Issue #32]: https://github.com/bitvecto-rs/bitvec/issues/32
-[Issue #50]: https://github.com/bitvecto-rs/bitvec/issues/50
-[Issue #69]: https://github.com/bitvecto-rs/bitvec/issues/69
-[Issue #75]: https://github.com/bitvecto-rs/bitvec/issues/75
-[Issue #83]: https://github.com/bitvecto-rs/bitvec/issues/83
-[Issue #103]: https://github.com/bitvecto-rs/bitvec/issues/103
-[Issue #114]: https://github.com/bitvecto-rs/bitvec/issues/114
-[Issue #136]: https://github.com/bitvecto-rs/bitvec/issues/136
-[Issue #156]: https://github.com/bitvecto-rs/bitvec/issues/156
-[Issue #167]: https://github.com/bitvecto-rs/bitvec/issues/167
-[Issue #169]: https://github.com/bitvecto-rs/bitvec/issues/169
+[Issue #6]: https://github.com/ferrilab/bitvec/issues/6
+[Issue #17]: https://github.com/ferrilab/bitvec/issues/17
+[Issue #32]: https://github.com/ferrilab/bitvec/issues/32
+[Issue #50]: https://github.com/ferrilab/bitvec/issues/50
+[Issue #69]: https://github.com/ferrilab/bitvec/issues/69
+[Issue #75]: https://github.com/ferrilab/bitvec/issues/75
+[Issue #83]: https://github.com/ferrilab/bitvec/issues/83
+[Issue #103]: https://github.com/ferrilab/bitvec/issues/103
+[Issue #114]: https://github.com/ferrilab/bitvec/issues/114
+[Issue #136]: https://github.com/ferrilab/bitvec/issues/136
+[Issue #156]: https://github.com/ferrilab/bitvec/issues/156
+[Issue #167]: https://github.com/ferrilab/bitvec/issues/167
+[Issue #169]: https://github.com/ferrilab/bitvec/issues/169
 
 <!-- Pull Requests -->
 
-[Pull Request #34]: https://github.com/bitvecto-rs/bitvec/pull/34
-[Pull Request #68]: https://github.com/bitvecto-rs/bitvec/pull/68
-[Pull Request #104]: https://github.com/bitvecto-rs/bitvec/pull/104
-[Pull Request #160]: https://github.com/bitvecto-rs/bitvec/pull/160
-[Pull Request #162]: https://github.com/bitvecto-rs/bitvec/pull/162
-[Pull Request #185]: https://github.com/bitvecto-rs/bitvec/pull/185
+[Pull Request #34]: https://github.com/ferrilab/bitvec/pull/34
+[Pull Request #68]: https://github.com/ferrilab/bitvec/pull/68
+[Pull Request #104]: https://github.com/ferrilab/bitvec/pull/104
+[Pull Request #160]: https://github.com/ferrilab/bitvec/pull/160
+[Pull Request #162]: https://github.com/ferrilab/bitvec/pull/162
+[Pull Request #185]: https://github.com/ferrilab/bitvec/pull/185
 
 <!-- Other -->
 
 [`bit-set`]: https://crates.io/crates/bit-set
 [`sharksforarms/deku#246`]: https://github.com/sharksforarms/deku/pull/246
 [kac]: https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/
-[user guide]: https://bitvecto-rs.github.io/bitvec/
+[user guide]: https://ferrilab.github.io/bitvec/

CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

@@ -8,4 +8,4 @@ me, over any medium, about the project.
 
 [Twitter account]: https://twitter.com/bitvec_rs
 [coc]: https://www.rust-lang.org/policies/code-of-conduct
-[repository]: https://github.com/myrrlyn/bitvec
+[repository]: https://github.com/ferrilab/bitvec

Cargo.toml

@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ categories = [
 ]
 description = "Addresses memory by bits, for packed collections and bitfields"
 documentation = "https://docs.rs/bitvec/latest/bitvec"
-homepage = "https://bitvecto-rs.github.io/bitvec"
+homepage = "https://ferrilab.github.io/bitvec"
 include = [
 	"Cargo.toml",
 	"LICENSE.txt",
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ keywords = [
 ]
 license = "MIT"
 readme = "README.md"
-repository = "https://github.com/bitvecto-rs/bitvec"
+repository = "https://github.com/ferrilab/bitvec"
 rust-version = "1.56"
 
 [features]
@@ -95,15 +95,15 @@ features = [
 ]
 
 [badges.codecov]
-repository = "bitvecto-rs/bitvec"
+repository = "ferrilab/bitvec"
 branch = "main"
 service = "github"
 
 [badges.is-it-maintained-issue-resolution]
-repository = "bitvecto-rs/bitvec"
+repository = "ferrilab/bitvec"
 
 [badges.is-it-maintained-open-issues]
-repository = "bitvecto-rs/bitvec"
+repository = "ferrilab/bitvec"
 
 [badges.maintenance]
 status = "passively-maintained"

README.md

@@ -395,7 +395,7 @@ does, how it works, and how it can be useful to you.
 [docs_link]: https://docs.rs/bitvec/latest/bitvec "Crate documentation"
 [docs_img]: https://img.shields.io/docsrs/bitvec/latest.svg?style=for-the-badge "Documentation badge"
 [downloads_img]: https://img.shields.io/crates/dv/bitvec.svg?style=for-the-badge "Crate downloads"
-[license_file]: https://github.com/bitvecto-rs/bitvec/blob/main/LICENSE.txt "Project license"
+[license_file]: https://github.com/ferrilab/bitvec/blob/main/LICENSE.txt "Project license"
 [license_img]: https://img.shields.io/crates/l/bitvec.svg?style=for-the-badge "License badge"
 [msrv_img]: https://img.shields.io/badge/MSRV-1.56-f46623?style=for-the-badge&logo=rust "Minimum Supported Rust Version: 1.56"
 
@@ -414,8 +414,8 @@ does, how it works, and how it can be useful to you.
 [`deku`]: https://crates.io/crates/deku
 [docsrs]: https://docs.rs/bitvec/latest/bitvec
 [erl_bit]: https://www.erlang.org/doc/programming_examples/bit_syntax.html
-[guide]: https://bitvecto-rs.github.io/bitvec/
-[issue]: https://github.com/bitvecto-rs/bitvec/issues/new
+[guide]: https://ferrilab.github.io/bitvec/
+[issue]: https://github.com/ferrilab/bitvec/issues/new
 [moz]: https://hacks.mozilla.org/2021/04/eliminating-data-races-in-firefox-a-technical-report/ "Mozilla Hacks article describing various concurrency bugs in FireFox"
 [`radium`]: https://crates.io/crates/radium
 [`std::bitset<N>`]: https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/utility/bitset

benches/macros.rs

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ compare the macros against `vec!`. While `vec!` will always be faster, because
 Original performance was 10,000x slower. Performance after the fix for #28 was
 within 20ns.
 
-[issue #28]: https://github.com/myrrlyn/bitvec/issues/28
+[issue #28]: https://github.com/ferrilab/bitvec/issues/28
 !*/
 
 #![feature(test)]

book/afterword.md

@@ -15,4 +15,4 @@ Thank you for using `bitvec`. I am delighted that other people have found my
 work both interesting and useful, and I’m glad that I’ve been able to help
 people like you write better programs.
 
-[0]: https://github.com/bitvecto-rs/bitvec/issues/new
+[0]: https://github.com/ferrilab/bitvec/issues/new

book/introduction.md

@@ -38,5 +38,5 @@ document, and throughout the book I will periodically remind you that if a
 section is unclear, it is an error on my part, and I would appreciate an issue
 or other contact so that I can improve it.
 
-[CONTRIBUTING]: https://github.com/myrrlyn/bitvec/blob/HEAD/CONTRIBUTING.md "project contribution guide"
+[CONTRIBUTING]: https://github.com/ferrilab/bitvec/blob/HEAD/CONTRIBUTING.md "project contribution guide"
 [docs.rs]: https://docs.rs/bitvec "bitvec API documentation"

doc/domain/Domain.md

@@ -58,6 +58,6 @@ stored value (with all ungoverned bits cleared to 0), and a `.store_value()`
 that writes into its governed bits. If present, the fully-occupied slice can be
 used as normal.
 
-[0]: https://github.com/bitvecto-rs/bitvec/issues/new
+[0]: https://github.com/ferrilab/bitvec/issues/new
 [`PartialElement`]: crate::domain::PartialElement
 [`PartialElement::load_value`]: crate::domain::PartialElement::load_value

doc/field/BitField_Lsb0_load_be.md

@@ -74,4 +74,4 @@ for each combination of `<T: BitStore, O: BitOrder>`, and may be of additional
 use when choosing a combination of type parameters and load functions.
 
 [orig]: crate::field::BitField::load_le
-[user guide]: https://bitvecto-rs.github.io/bitvec/memory-layout
+[user guide]: https://ferrilab.github.io/bitvec/memory-layout

doc/field/BitField_Lsb0_load_le.md

@@ -74,4 +74,4 @@ for each combination of `<T: BitStore, O: BitOrder>`, and may be of additional
 use when choosing a combination of type parameters and load functions.
 
 [orig]: crate::field::BitField::load_le
-[user guide]: https://bitvecto-rs.github.io/bitvec/memory-layout
+[user guide]: https://ferrilab.github.io/bitvec/memory-layout

doc/field/BitField_Lsb0_store_be.md

@@ -66,4 +66,4 @@ for each combination of `<T: BitStore, O: BitOrder>`, and may be of additional
 use when choosing a combination of type parameters and store functions.
 
 [orig]: crate::field::BitField::store_be
-[user guide]: https://bitvecto-rs.github.io/bitvec/memory-layout
+[user guide]: https://ferrilab.github.io/bitvec/memory-layout

doc/field/BitField_Lsb0_store_le.md

@@ -66,4 +66,4 @@ for each combination of `<T: BitStore, O: BitOrder>`, and may be of additional
 use when choosing a combination of type parameters and store functions.
 
 [orig]: crate::field::BitField::store_le
-[user guide]: https://bitvecto-rs.github.io/bitvec/memory-layout
+[user guide]: https://ferrilab.github.io/bitvec/memory-layout

doc/field/BitField_Msb0_load_be.md

@@ -74,4 +74,4 @@ for each combination of `<T: BitStore, O: BitOrder>`, and may be of additional
 use when choosing a combination of type parameters and load functions.
 
 [orig]: crate::field::BitField::load_le
-[user guide]: https://bitvecto-rs.github.io/bitvec/memory-layout
+[user guide]: https://ferrilab.github.io/bitvec/memory-layout

doc/field/BitField_Msb0_load_le.md

@@ -74,4 +74,4 @@ for each combination of `<T: BitStore, O: BitOrder>`, and may be of additional
 use when choosing a combination of type parameters and load functions.
 
 [orig]: crate::field::BitField::load_le
-[user guide]: https://bitvecto-rs.github.io/bitvec/memory-layout
+[user guide]: https://ferrilab.github.io/bitvec/memory-layout

doc/field/BitField_Msb0_store_be.md

@@ -66,4 +66,4 @@ for each combination of `<T: BitStore, O: BitOrder>`, and may be of additional
 use when choosing a combination of type parameters and store functions.
 
 [orig]: crate::field::BitField::store_be
-[user guide]: https://bitvecto-rs.github.io/bitvec/memory-layout
+[user guide]: https://ferrilab.github.io/bitvec/memory-layout

doc/field/BitField_Msb0_store_le.md

@@ -66,4 +66,4 @@ for each combination of `<T: BitStore, O: BitOrder>`, and may be of additional
 use when choosing a combination of type parameters and store functions.
 
 [orig]: crate::field::BitField::store_le
-[user guide]: https://bitvecto-rs.github.io/bitvec/memory-layout
+[user guide]: https://ferrilab.github.io/bitvec/memory-layout

doc/order/LocalBits.md

@@ -20,4 +20,4 @@ match GCC’s `std::bitset<N>`. It makes no guarantee about what C compilers for
 your target actually do, and you will need to do your own investigation if you
 are exchanging a single buffer across FFI in this manner.
 
-[0]: https://bitvecto-rs.github.io/bitvec/memory-representation
+[0]: https://ferrilab.github.io/bitvec/memory-representation

doc/order/Lsb0.md

@@ -10,4 +10,4 @@ This is the default type parameter used throughout the crate. If you do not have
 a desired memory representation, you should continue to use it, as it provides
 the best codegen for bit manipulation.
 
-[0]: https://bitvecto-rs.github.io/bitvec/memory-representation
+[0]: https://ferrilab.github.io/bitvec/memory-representation

doc/order/Msb0.md

@@ -10,4 +10,4 @@ This type likely matches the ordering of bits you would expect to see in a
 debugger, but has worse codegen than `Lsb0`, and is not encouraged if you are
 not doing direct memory inspection.
 
-[0]: https://bitvecto-rs.github.io/bitvec/memory-representation
+[0]: https://ferrilab.github.io/bitvec/memory-representation

doc/vec/BitVec.md

@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ to view its contents. You can accomplish this through safe APIs such as
 initialize the memory elements underlying the `BitVec` buffer without incurring
 undefined behavior in their operation.
 
-[book]: https://bitvecto-rs.github.io/bitvec/type-parameters.html
+[book]: https://ferrilab.github.io/bitvec/type-parameters.html
 [`BitAccess`]: crate::access::BitAccess
 [`BitArray`]: crate::array::BitArray
 [`BitField`]: crate::field::BitField

src/ptr/span.rs

@@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ where
 		let len_head = head & Self::LEN_HEAD_MASK;
 		let len_bits = bits << Self::LEN_HEAD_BITS;
 
-		/* See <https://github.com/bitvecto-rs/bitvec/issues/135#issuecomment-986357842>.
+		/* See <https://github.com/ferrilab/bitvec/issues/135#issuecomment-986357842>.
 		 * This attempts to retain inbound provenance information and may help
 		 * Miri better understand pointer operations this module performs.
 		 *

src/slice/api.rs

@@ -2289,7 +2289,7 @@ where
 	/// assert!(sfx.len() <= 8);
 	/// ```
 	///
-	/// [layout]: https://bitvecto-rs.github.io/bitvec/memory-layout.html
+	/// [layout]: https://ferrilab.github.io/bitvec/memory-layout.html
 	#[inline]
 	pub unsafe fn align_to<U>(&self) -> (&Self, &BitSlice<U, O>, &Self)
 	where U: BitStore {
@@ -2341,7 +2341,7 @@ where
 	/// assert!(sfx.len() <= 8);
 	/// ```
 	///
-	/// [layout]: https://bitvecto-rs.github.io/bitvec/memory-layout.html
+	/// [layout]: https://ferrilab.github.io/bitvec/memory-layout.html
 	#[inline]
 	pub unsafe fn align_to_mut<U>(
 		&mut self,

tests/bincode.rs

@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ format, but only if its data buffer can be reconstituted from the slice model.
 
 `bitvec` does not guarantee cross-version serialization format compatibility.
 
-[Issue #96]: https://github.com/bitvecto-rs/bitvec/issues/96
+[Issue #96]: https://github.com/ferrilab/bitvec/issues/96
 !*/
 
 #![cfg(feature = "serde")]

tests/issues.rs

@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ In the future, it may be possible to revert to the original
 `<[T] as ToOwned>::to_owned` implementation, if `BitVec` becomes capable of
 partial heads without loss of pointer information.
 
-[Issue #10]: https://github.com/bitvecto-rs/bitvec/issues/10
+[Issue #10]: https://github.com/ferrilab/bitvec/issues/10
 [@overminder]: https://github.com/overminder
 **/
 #[test]
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ and `Vec::reserve` did not see the request amount as requiring a reällocation.
 length, which produces the correct reservation request for `Vec::reserve`,
 fixing the error.
 
-[Issue #33]: https://github.com/bitvecto-rs/bitvec/issues/33
+[Issue #33]: https://github.com/ferrilab/bitvec/issues/33
 [@jonas-schievink]: https://github.com/jonas-schievink
 **/
 #[test]
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ class in `bitvec`. This is the same bug class that occurred in #65, and has the
 same solution: uninitialized memory in the `BitVec` buffer is not required to be
 zeroed.
 
-[Issue #62]: https://github.com/bitvecto-rs/bitvec/issues/62
+[Issue #62]: https://github.com/ferrilab/bitvec/issues/62
 [@sharksforarms]: https://github.com/sharksforarms
 **/
 #[test]
@@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ fn issue_62() {
 This issue found the use of uninitialized memory in
 `BitVec::extend_from_bitslice` causing non-deterministic behavior.
 
-[Issue #65]: https://github.com/bitvecto-rs/bitvec/issues/65
+[Issue #65]: https://github.com/ferrilab/bitvec/issues/65
 [@inikulin]: https://github.com/inikulin
 **/
 #[test]
@@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ alarms.
 This test is only useful when run under `cargo +nightly miri test`. It asserts
 that the allocation pointer is correctly managed during drop.
 
-[Issue #10]: https://github.com/bitvecto-rs/bitvec/issues/69
+[Issue #10]: https://github.com/ferrilab/bitvec/issues/69
 [@YoshikiTakashima]: https://github.com/YoshikiTakashima
 **/
 #[test]
@@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ The overly-large scaling in computation of `.len()` caused `Rev<>`, which relies
 on a correct implementation of `.len()`, to attempt to access memory out of
 bounds inside `Iter::nth`.
 
-[Issue #77]: https://github.com/bitvecto-rs/bitvec/issues/77
+[Issue #77]: https://github.com/ferrilab/bitvec/issues/77
 [@Cryptjar]: https://github.com/Cryptjar
 **/
 #[test]
@@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ the galloping searches, but for now, this is an improvement over the existing
 behavior, so I am going to call it sufficient for the bug as reported, publish
 patches, and await further reports.
 
-[Issue #114]: https://github.com/bitvecto-rs/bitvec/issues/114
+[Issue #114]: https://github.com/ferrilab/bitvec/issues/114
 [@VilleHallivuori]: https://github.com/VilleHallivuori
 **/
 #[test]
@@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ The logic for `{leading, trailing}_{zeros, ones}` works by finding the index
 of the opposite bit. If the opposite bit does not exist, the correct behavior
 is to return the whole length of the slice, rather than 0.
 
-[Issue #120]: https://github.com/bitvecto-rs/bitvec/issues/120
+[Issue #120]: https://github.com/ferrilab/bitvec/issues/120
 [@hzuo]: https://github.com/hzuo
 **/
 #[test]
@@ -346,7 +346,7 @@ I incorrectly implemented parts of `ChunksExact`, subtracting more than was
 correct. I have repaired this by directly transcribing from the standard library
 implementation.
 
-[Issue #142]: https://github.com/bitvecto-rs/bitvec/issues/142
+[Issue #142]: https://github.com/ferrilab/bitvec/issues/142
 [@jmmaloney4]: https://github.com/jmmaloney4
 **/
 #[test]