Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: Remove Ajv configuration from TypeBox Type Provider examples #4249

Merged

Conversation

msmolens
Copy link
Contributor

@msmolens msmolens commented Sep 2, 2022

Remove Ajv configuration from example code in the Type Providers documentation.

As described in #4095, TypeBox no longer requires explicitly configuring Ajv to recognize the kind and modifier keywords.

Checklist

Remove Ajv configuration from example code in the Type Providers
documentation.

As described in fastify#4095, TypeBox no
longer requires explicitly configuring Ajv to recognize the `kind` and
`modifier` keywords.
@github-actions github-actions bot added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Sep 2, 2022
@Fdawgs Fdawgs changed the title Remove Ajv configuration from TypeBox Type Provider examples docs: Remove Ajv configuration from TypeBox Type Provider examples Sep 3, 2022
Copy link
Member

@mcollina mcollina left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@mcollina mcollina merged commit 8971520 into fastify:main Sep 3, 2022
@msmolens msmolens deleted the update-typebox-type-provider-examples branch September 3, 2022 12:20
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 4, 2023

This pull request has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 4, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants