Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Don't discard render phase state updates with the eager reducer optimization #14852

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Feb 19, 2019
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 3 additions & 1 deletion packages/react-reconciler/src/ReactFiberHooks.js
Expand Up @@ -607,7 +607,6 @@ function updateReducer<S, I, A>(
}

hook.memoizedState = newState;

// Don't persist the state accumlated from the render phase updates to
// the base state unless the queue is empty.
// TODO: Not sure if this is the desired semantics, but it's what we
Expand All @@ -616,6 +615,9 @@ function updateReducer<S, I, A>(
hook.baseState = newState;
}

queue.eagerReducer = reducer;
queue.eagerState = newState;

return [newState, dispatch];
}
}
Expand Down
Expand Up @@ -669,6 +669,76 @@ describe('ReactHooks', () => {
}).toThrow('is not a function');
});

it('does not forget render phase useState updates inside an effect', () => {
const {useState, useEffect} = React;

function Counter() {
const [counter, setCounter] = useState(0);
if (counter === 0) {
setCounter(x => x + 1);
setCounter(x => x + 1);
}
useEffect(() => {
setCounter(x => x + 1);
setCounter(x => x + 1);
}, []);
return counter;
}

const root = ReactTestRenderer.create(null);
ReactTestRenderer.act(() => {
root.update(<Counter />);
});
expect(root).toMatchRenderedOutput('4');
});

it('does not forget render phase useReducer updates inside an effect with hoisted reducer', () => {
const {useReducer, useEffect} = React;

const reducer = x => x + 1;
function Counter() {
const [counter, increment] = useReducer(reducer, 0);
if (counter === 0) {
increment();
increment();
}
useEffect(() => {
increment();
increment();
}, []);
return counter;
}

const root = ReactTestRenderer.create(null);
ReactTestRenderer.act(() => {
root.update(<Counter />);
});
expect(root).toMatchRenderedOutput('4');
});

it('does not forget render phase useReducer updates inside an effect with inline reducer', () => {
const {useReducer, useEffect} = React;

function Counter() {
const [counter, increment] = useReducer(x => x + 1, 0);
if (counter === 0) {
increment();
increment();
}
useEffect(() => {
increment();
increment();
}, []);
return counter;
}

const root = ReactTestRenderer.create(null);
ReactTestRenderer.act(() => {
root.update(<Counter />);
});
expect(root).toMatchRenderedOutput('4');
});

it('warns for bad useImperativeHandle first arg', () => {
const {useImperativeHandle} = React;
function App() {
Expand Down
Expand Up @@ -454,7 +454,9 @@ describe('ReactHooksWithNoopRenderer', () => {

// Test that it works on update, too. This time the log is a bit different
// because we started with reducerB instead of reducerA.
counter.current.dispatch('reset');
ReactNoop.act(() => {
counter.current.dispatch('reset');
});
ReactNoop.render(<Counter ref={counter} />);
expect(ReactNoop.flush()).toEqual([
'Render: 0',
Expand Down