Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Correctly parse partial objects with optional value #44304

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

christophpurrer
Copy link
Contributor

Summary:
The flow parser always returns if a property IS optional (true|false) OR not

The TypeScript one only emits optional if the prop is optional.

The current partialProperty UTs are not correct.

Changelog: [General][Fixed] - Correctly parse partial objects with optional value

Differential Revision: D56689387

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. p: Facebook Partner: Facebook Partner labels Apr 29, 2024
@analysis-bot
Copy link

analysis-bot commented Apr 29, 2024

Platform Engine Arch Size (bytes) Diff
android hermes arm64-v8a 19,461,330 -1
android hermes armeabi-v7a n/a --
android hermes x86 n/a --
android hermes x86_64 n/a --
android jsc arm64-v8a 22,834,250 -2
android jsc armeabi-v7a n/a --
android jsc x86 n/a --
android jsc x86_64 n/a --

Base commit: bb2c13a
Branch: main

Summary:
The flow parser *always* returns if a property IS `optional` (true|false) OR not

The TypeScript one only emits `optional` if the prop is optional.

The current `partialProperty` UTs are not correct.

Changelog: [General][Fixed] -  Correctly parse partial objects with optional value

Differential Revision: D56689387
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. p: Facebook Partner: Facebook Partner
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants