New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(search-algolia): algolia externalUrl regex to navigate with window.href #5795
Merged
slorber
merged 1 commit into
facebook:main
from
semoal:semoal/feat-external-url-algolia
Oct 29, 2021
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ | ||
/** | ||
* Copyright (c) Facebook, Inc. and its affiliates. | ||
* | ||
* This source code is licensed under the MIT license found in the | ||
* LICENSE file in the root directory of this source tree. | ||
*/ | ||
|
||
/** | ||
* Utility to convert an optional string into a Regex case sensitive and global | ||
*/ | ||
export function isRegexpStringMatch( | ||
regexAsString?: string, | ||
valueToTest?: string, | ||
): boolean { | ||
if ( | ||
typeof regexAsString === 'undefined' || | ||
typeof valueToTest === 'undefined' | ||
) { | ||
return false; | ||
} | ||
|
||
return new RegExp(regexAsString, 'gi').test(valueToTest); | ||
} |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I suggest moving this to
jsUtils
. We shouldn't keep on adding more files, especially for these general-purpose utilitiesThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
imho, it's easier to keep it separated on files for an easier search on the editor. (At least for me)
But as @slorber considers :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That really depends on the editor:D Most decent editors allow you to search globally, but navigating in one file is always easier than in a giant directory. If there are more regex tools to come that we can envision, keeping it seperated can be a good idea, but... I'm not sure if there are many painpoints with regex that need utility functions
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't care too much about the filename as long as the import name is understandable: it's an implementation detail that we can easily refactor later.
Not a fan of a fn with signature
RegExp | {test: () => boolean}
, what about returning the boolean and calling test() inside directly?And "" should not be handled like undefined
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yep that makes snse to me too, refactored to be much cleaner.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would have used a simpler
isRegexpStringMatch(regex,str)
rather than a higher order function, but it's not too important