Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore #3906: deprecating CustomResourceList #4232

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jul 4, 2022
Merged

Conversation

shawkins
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Partially addresses #3906 - by deprecating CustomResourceList as it provides no additional functionality.

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change
  • Chore (non-breaking change which doesn't affect codebase;
    test, version modification, documentation, etc.)

Checklist

  • Code contributed by me aligns with current project license: Apache 2.0
  • I Added CHANGELOG entry regarding this change
  • I have implemented unit tests to cover my changes
  • I have added/updated the javadocs and other documentation accordingly
  • No new bugs, code smells, etc. in SonarCloud report
  • I tested my code in Kubernetes
  • I tested my code in OpenShift

@@ -248,6 +248,8 @@ We've removed setter methods `setIntVal`, `setKind`, `setStrVal` from the class.

The only exception to the above is `patch(PatchContext, item)` - it is valid to be called after withName.

CustomResourceList was deprecated - use DefaultKubernetesResourceList instead.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is supposed to be a list entry, right?

Suggested change
CustomResourceList was deprecated - use DefaultKubernetesResourceList instead.
- CustomResourceList was deprecated - use DefaultKubernetesResourceList instead.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@rohanKanojia I added your change along with making the previous line continue from the preceding bullet point.

@rohanKanojia
Copy link
Member

Shall we also migrate these CustomResource classes in kubernetes-tests to use DefaultKubernetesResourceList?

@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Jun 29, 2022

SonarCloud Quality Gate failed.    Quality Gate failed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell B 1 Code Smell

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@shawkins
Copy link
Contributor Author

Shall we also migrate these CustomResource classes in kubernetes-tests to use DefaultKubernetesResourceList?

I'm fine if we wait until wait until the class is removed.

@manusa manusa added this to the 6.0.0 milestone Jul 4, 2022
@manusa manusa merged commit a5285fb into fabric8io:master Jul 4, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants