Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🧪 CI: Add fuzzing workflow for PRs #262

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Apr 25, 2023
Merged

🧪 CI: Add fuzzing workflow for PRs #262

merged 3 commits into from Apr 25, 2023

Conversation

chrisjsewell
Copy link
Member

@chrisjsewell chrisjsewell commented Apr 25, 2023

This action runs fuzzing for a brief period of time, only against the actual code added in the PR.
It is intended as a relatively quick check,
to guard against code introducing crashes in the Markdown parsing, which should in principle always run against any text input. See: https://google.github.io/oss-fuzz/getting-started/continuous-integration/#how-it-works

This action runs fuzzing for a brief period of time,
only aginst the actual code added in the PR.
It is intended a relatively quick check,
to guard against code introducing crashes in the Markdown parsing,
which should in principle always run against any text input.
See: https://google.github.io/oss-fuzz/getting-started/continuous-integration/#how-it-works
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 25, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch and project coverage have no change.

Comparison is base (e717248) 96.07% compared to head (e5eac1b) 96.07%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #262   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.07%   96.07%           
=======================================
  Files          62       62           
  Lines        3236     3236           
=======================================
  Hits         3109     3109           
  Misses        127      127           
Flag Coverage Δ
pytests 96.07% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@chrisjsewell chrisjsewell merged commit 2d46a43 into master Apr 25, 2023
16 checks passed
@chrisjsewell chrisjsewell deleted the fuzzing-ci branch April 25, 2023 15:16
netbsd-srcmastr pushed a commit to NetBSD/pkgsrc that referenced this pull request Jun 6, 2023
## 3.0.0 - 2023-06-03

⚠️ This release contains some minor breaking changes in the internal API and improvements to the parsing strictness.

**Full Changelog**: <executablebooks/markdown-it-py@v2.2.0...v3.0.0>

### ⬆️ UPGRADE: Drop support for Python 3.7

Also add testing for Python 3.11

### ⬆️ UPGRADE: Update from upstream markdown-it `12.2.0` to `13.0.0`

A key change is the addition of a new `Token` type, `text_special`, which is used to represent HTML entities and backslash escaped characters.
This ensures that (core) typographic transformation rules are not incorrectly applied to these texts.
The final core rule is now the new `text_join` rule, which joins adjacent `text`/`text_special` tokens,
and so no `text_special` tokens should be present in the final token stream.
Any custom typographic rules should be inserted before `text_join`.

A new `linkify` rule has also been added to the inline chain, which will linkify full URLs (e.g. `https://example.com`),
and fixes collision of emphasis and linkifier (so `http://example.org/foo._bar_-_baz` is now a single link, not emphasized).
Emails and fuzzy links are not affected by this.

* ♻️ Refactor backslash escape logic, add `text_special` [#276](executablebooks/markdown-it-py#276)
* ♻️ Parse entities to `text_special` token [#280](executablebooks/markdown-it-py#280)
* ♻️ Refactor: Add linkifier rule to inline chain for full links [#279](executablebooks/markdown-it-py#279)
* ‼️ Remove `(p)` => `§` replacement in typographer [#281](executablebooks/markdown-it-py#281)
* ‼️ Remove unused `silent` arg in `ParserBlock.tokenize` [#284](executablebooks/markdown-it-py#284)
* 🐛 FIX: numeric character reference passing [#272](executablebooks/markdown-it-py#272)
* 🐛 Fix: tab preventing paragraph continuation in lists [#274](executablebooks/markdown-it-py#274)
* 👌 Improve nested emphasis parsing [#273](executablebooks/markdown-it-py#273)
* 👌 fix possible ReDOS in newline rule [#275](executablebooks/markdown-it-py#275)
* 👌 Improve performance of `skipSpaces`/`skipChars` [#271](executablebooks/markdown-it-py#271)
* 👌 Show text of `text_special` in `tree.pretty` [#282](executablebooks/markdown-it-py#282)

### ♻️ REFACTOR: Replace most character code use with strings

The use of `StateBase.srcCharCode` is deprecated (with backward-compatibility), and all core uses are replaced by `StateBase.src`.

Conversion of source string characters to an integer representing the Unicode character is prevalent in the upstream JavaScript implementation, to improve performance.
However, it is unnecessary in Python and leads to harder to read code and performance deprecations (during the conversion in the `StateBase` initialisation).

See [#270](executablebooks/markdown-it-py#270), thanks to [@hukkinj1](https://github.com/hukkinj1).

### ♻️ Centralise indented code block tests

For CommonMark, the presence of indented code blocks prevent any other block element from having an indent of greater than 4 spaces.
Certain Markdown flavors and derivatives, such as mdx and djot, disable these code blocks though, since it is more common to use code fences and/or arbitrary indenting is desirable.
Previously, disabling code blocks did not remove the indent limitation, since most block elements had the 3 space limitation hard-coded.
This change centralised the logic of applying this limitation (in `StateBlock.is_code_block`), and only applies it when indented code blocks are enabled.

This allows for e.g.

```md
<div>
  <div>

    I can indent as much as I want here.

  <div>
<div>
```

See [#260](executablebooks/markdown-it-py#260)

### 🔧 Maintenance changes

Strict type annotation checking has been applied to the whole code base,
[ruff](https://github.com/charliermarsh/ruff) is now used for linting,
and fuzzing tests have been added to the CI, to integrate with Google [OSS-Fuzz](https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/tree/master/projects/markdown-it-py) testing, thanks to [@DavidKorczynski](https://github.com/DavidKorczynski).

* 🔧 MAINTAIN: Make type checking strict [#](executablebooks/markdown-it-py#267)
* 🔧 Add typing of rule functions [#283](executablebooks/markdown-it-py#283)
* 🔧 Move linting from flake8 to ruff [#268](executablebooks/markdown-it-py#268)
* 🧪 CI: Add fuzzing workflow for PRs [#262](executablebooks/markdown-it-py#262)
* 🔧 Add tox env for fuzz testcase run [#263](executablebooks/markdown-it-py#263)
* 🧪 Add OSS-Fuzz set up by @DavidKorczynski in [#255](executablebooks/markdown-it-py#255)
* 🧪 Fix fuzzing test failures [#254](executablebooks/markdown-it-py#254)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant