Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

馃悰 FIX: Spurious newline in generated literal_block nodes #541

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

cpitclaudel
Copy link
Contributor

@cpitclaudel cpitclaudel commented Apr 1, 2022

Closes #407. The details are in the original bug report, but the long story short is that Docutils already adds a newline to its <pre> blocks, so we don't need one more. I opted to fix all literal_blocks, but the most important ones are the ones in create_highlighted_code_block.

@chrisjsewell
Copy link
Member

Cheers @cpitclaudel, I will have a look probably Monday now

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 13, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #541 (45c32c8) into master (8f53a0b) will decrease coverage by 0.06%.
The diff coverage is 83.33%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #541      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   89.78%   89.72%   -0.07%     
==========================================
  Files          16       16              
  Lines        2104     2111       +7     
==========================================
+ Hits         1889     1894       +5     
- Misses        215      217       +2     
Flag Coverage 螖
pytests 89.72% <83.33%> (-0.07%) 猬囷笍

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage 螖
myst_parser/docutils_renderer.py 91.86% <83.33%> (+0.07%) 猬嗭笍
myst_parser/mocking.py 85.43% <0.00%> (-0.79%) 猬囷笍

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
螖 = absolute <relative> (impact), 酶 = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 8f53a0b...45c32c8. Read the comment docs.

@chrisjsewell
Copy link
Member

Thanks @cpitclaudel this requires fixes for a number of the regression tests (if you didn't know you can run pytest --force-regen

My question would be though; should the behaviour be the same for docutils and sphinx? i.e.does the sphinx builder also require this new line removal?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Spurious newline in generated literal_block nodes
2 participants