Fix GreenSocket conflict with pysocks

[terryzhu]

#616
Anorov/PySocks#121

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: 2 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (4705f07) 44% compared to head (319a384) 44%.
Report is 67 commits behind head on master.

❗ Current head 319a384 differs from pull request most recent head c178025. Consider uploading reports for the commit c178025 to get more accurate results

Files	Patch %	Lines
eventlet/greenio/base.py	0%	1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #680   +/-   ##
======================================
- Coverage      44%     44%   -1%     
======================================
  Files          87      87           
  Lines       11917   11914    -3     
  Branches     1780    1781    +1     
======================================
- Hits         5290    5284    -6     
- Misses       6224    6226    +2     
- Partials      403     404    +1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
ipv6	16% <0%> (-1%)	⬇️
py27epolls	56% <0%> (-1%)	⬇️
py27poll	56% <0%> (-1%)	⬇️
py27selects	55% <0%> (-1%)	⬇️
py35epolls	49% <0%> (-1%)	⬇️
py35poll	49% <0%> (-1%)	⬇️
py35selects	49% <0%> (-1%)	⬇️
py36epolls	49% <0%> (-1%)	⬇️
py36poll	49% <0%> (-1%)	⬇️
py36selects	49% <0%> (-1%)	⬇️
py37epolls	49% <0%> (-1%)	⬇️
py37poll	49% <0%> (-1%)	⬇️
py37selects	49% <0%> (-1%)	⬇️
py38epolls	40% <0%> (-1%)	⬇️
py38openssl	39% <0%> (-1%)	⬇️
py38poll	40% <0%> (-1%)	⬇️
py38selects	40% <0%> (-1%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[temoto]

Suggested change

	if not (self.act_non_blocking == False and self._timeout is None):
	if self.act_non_blocking or self._timeout is not None:

or at least x == False -> not x

[temoto]

Also needs a test.